ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Good NEWS: partitioning a simple polygon by compass directions
Full text PdfPdf (309 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Applications table of contents
Pages: 78 - 87  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-663-3
Authors
Marc van Kreveld  Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Iris Reinbacher  Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 20,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/777792.777804
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Motivated by geographic information retrieval, we study the problem of partitioning a simple polygon into four parts that can be considered as the North, East, West, and South. We list criteria for such partitionings, propose formalizations into geometric problems, and give efficient algorithms. An implementation and tests on country outlines show the results for three different partitionings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A.I. Abdelmoty and B.A. El-Geresy. An intersection-based formalism for representing orientation relations in a geographic database. In 2nd ACM Workshop on Advances in GIS, 1994.
2
 
3
P. Bose, J. Czyzowicz, E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc, and D. Lessard. Near-optimal partitioning of rectangles and prisms. In Proc. 11th Canad. Conf. Comput. Geom., pages 162--165, 1999.
 
4
P. Bose, J. Czyzowicz, E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc, and A. Maheswari. A note on cutting circles and squares in equal area pieces. In Proc. FUN with Algorithms '98, 1998.
 
5
P.A. Burrough and A.U. Frank, editors. Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, volume II of GISDATA. Taylor & Francis, London, 1996.
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
M. Díaz and J. O'Rourke. Ham-sandwich sectioning of polygons. In Proc. 2nd Canad. Conf. Comput. Geom., pages 282--286, 1990.
 
10
M. Díaz and J. O'Rourke. Algorithms for computing the center of area of a convex polygon. Visual Comput., 10:432--442, 1994.
 
11
A.U. Frank. Qualitative spatial reasoning: Cardinal directions as an example. IJGIS, 10(3):269--290, 1996.
 
12
Susan Hert. Connected area partitioning. In Abstracts 17th European Workshop Comput. Geom., pages 35--38. Freie Universitat Berlin, 2001.
13
 
14
R. Larson. Geographic information retrieval and spatial browsing. In L.C. Smith and M. Gluck, editors, Geographic Information Systems and Libraries: Patrons, Maps, and Spatial Information, pages 81--124. 1996.
 
15
 
16
D.M. Mark. Toward a theoretical framework for geographic entitiy types. In A.U. Frank and I. Campari, editors, Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, number 716 in Lect. Notes in Computer Science, pages 270--283. 1993.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
U. Visser, T. Vogele, and C. Schlieder. Spatio-terminological information retrieval using the BUSTER system. In Proc. of the EnviroInfo, pages 93--100, 2002.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marc van Kreveld: colleagues
Iris Reinbacher: colleagues