ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Interfaces procédurales
Full text PdfPdf (303 KB)
Source IHM; Vol. 32 archive
Proceedings of the 14th French-speaking conference on Human-computer interaction (Conférence Francophone sur l'Interaction Homme-Machine) table of contents
Poitiers, France
Pages: 81 - 88  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-615-3
Author
Guy A. Boy  Institut Européen de l'Ingénierie et des Sciences Cognitives (EURISCO) 4, Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
Sponsors
: Laboratoire d'Informatique Scientifique et Industrielle
: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique
: Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
: Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
: Association Française des Sciences et Technologies de I'Information
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
: GDR-PRC Information Interaction Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/777005.777017
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A procedural interface enables users to concentrate on the task they are performing and to avoid any inappropriate overload coming from the use of desktop interfaces (where procedures are implicitly office-oriented). It automatically reconfigure itself depending its context of use, taking into account three types of cognitive functions: anticipation, interaction and recovery. A procedural interface involves several concepts such as simplicity, redundancy, cognitive stability and cognitive support. An example is provided in the domain of computer-supported meetings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
1. Apple. <i>Human Interface Guidelines: The Apple Desktop Interface</i>. Addison-Wesley.
2
 
3
 
4
4. Boy, G.A. (1998b). <i>Cognitive Function Analysis</i>. Ablex. Distributed by Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT.
 
5
5. Boy, G.A. (1998c). L'interaction homme-machine: une approche de l'ingénierie cognitive pour la conception centrée sur l'homme. <i>Sécurité et cognition</i>. Colloque du GIS Sciences de la Cognition, Ministère de la Recherche. HERMES Science, Paris.
 
6
6. Boy, G.A. & De Brito, G. (2000). Toward a Categorization of Factors related to Procedure Following and Situation Awareness. <i>Proceedings of the HCI-Aero 2000 Conference</i>, In Cooperation with ACM-SIGCHI. Cepadues, Toulouse, France.
 
7
7. Boy, G.A. & Ferro, D. (to appear in 2001). Using Cognitive Function Analysis to Prevent Controlled Flight Into Terrain. Chapter for the <i>Human Factors and Flight Deck Design</i> Book, Don Harris (Ed.), Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
 
8
8. Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R.E. Shaw & J. Bradshaw (Eds.) <i>Perceiving, Acting and Knowing</i>. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
 
9
 
10
 
11
11. Moran, T.P. (1994). Sepcial issue on context in design. <i>HCI Journal</i>. Volume 9, pp. 1-149.
 
12
12. Moran, T.P. & Dourish P. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on Context-Aware Computing. <i>HCI Journal</i>, Volume 16.
 
13
 
14
14. Norman, D.A. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In <i>User-Centered System Design</i>., D. Norman & S. Draper (Eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, pp. 31-61.
 
15
16
 
17
 
18
18. Reason, J. (1990). <i>Human error</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19
 
20
20. Smith, D. (1982). Designing the Star User Interface. <i>Byte</i>, April, pp. 242-282.