ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis and minimization techniques for total leakage considering gate oxide leakage
Full text PdfPdf (217 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Anaheim, CA, USA
SESSION: Managing leakage power table of contents
Pages: 175 - 180  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-688-9
Authors
Dongwoo Lee  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Wesley Kwong  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
David Blaauw  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Dennis Sylvester  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 23
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/775832.775878
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we address the growing issue of gate oxide leakage current (Igate) at the circuit level. Specifically, we develop a fast approach to analyze the total leakage power of a large circuit block, considering both Igate and subthreshold leakage (Isub). The interaction between Isub and Igate complicates analysis in arbitrary CMOS topologies and we propose simple and accurate heuristics based on table look-ups to quickly estimate the state-dependent total leakage current within 1% of SPICE. We then make several observations on the impact of Igate in designs that are standby power limited, including the role of device ordering within a stack and the differing state dependencies for NOR vs. NAND topologies. Based on these observations, we propose the use of pin reordering as a means to reduce Igate due to the dependence of gate leakage on stack node voltages.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Ono, et al., "A 100nm node CMOS technology for practical SOC application requirement," Proc. IEDM, pp. 511--514, 2001.
 
2
2001 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors.
 
3
B. Yu, et al., "Limits of gate oxide scaling in nano-transistors," Proc. Symp. VLSI Tech., pp. 90--91, 2000.
 
4
Y.-C. Yeo, et al., "Direct tunneling gate leakage current in transistors with ultra thin silicon nitride gate dielectric," IEEE Electron Device Letters, pp. 540--542, Nov. 2000.
 
5
C.-H. Choi, et al., "Impact of gate direct tunneling on circuit performance: a simulation study," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, pp. 2823--2829, Dec. 2001.
 
6
S. Schwantes and W. Krautschneider, "Relevance of gate current for the functionality of deep submicron CMOS circuits," European Solid-State Device Research Conf., 2001.
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
N. Yang, W. K. Henson, and J. J. Wortman, "A comparative study of gate direct tunneling and drain leakage currents in N-MOSFETs with sub-2nm gate oxides," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, pp. 1636--1644, Aug. 2000.
 
11
Y. Taur, "CMOS design near the limit of scaling," IBM J. R&D, pp. 213--222, March/May 2002.
 
12
M.C. Johnson, et. al., "Models and algorithms for bounds on leakage in CMOS circuits," IEEE Trans. CAD, pp. 714--725, June 1999.
 
13
J. Halter and F. Najm, "A gate-level leakage power reduction method for ultra-low-power CMOS circuits," Proc. CICC, pp. 475--478, 1997.
14
 
15
S. Ercolani, M. Favalli, M. Damiani, P. Olivo, B. Ricco, "Estimate of signal probability in combinational logic networks," Proc. European Test Conference, 1989, pp. 132--138.
 
16
F. Brglez and H. Fujiwara, "A Neutral Netlist of 10 Combinatorial Benchmark Circuits", Proc. ISCAS, 1985, pp.695--698.
 
17

CITED BY  23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dongwoo Lee: colleagues
Wesley Kwong: colleagues
David Blaauw: colleagues
Dennis Sylvester: colleagues