| A static pattern-independent technique for power grid voltage integrity verification |
| Full text |
Pdf
(244 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual Design Automation Conference
table of contents
Anaheim, CA, USA
SESSION: Power grid analysis and optimization
table of contents
Pages: 99 - 104
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-688-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 21, Citation Count: 13
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Design verification must include the power grid. Checking that the voltage on the power grid does not drop by more than some critical threshold is a very difficult problem, for at least two reasons: i) the obviously large size of the power grids for modern high-performance chips, and ii) the difficulty of setting up the right simulation conditions for the power grid that provide some measure of a realistic worst case voltage drop. The huge number of possible circuit operational modes or workloads makes it impossible to do exhaustive analysis. We propose a static technique for power grid verification, where static is in the sense of static timing analysis, meaning that it does not depend on, nor require, user-specified stimulus to drive a simulation. The verification is posed as an optimization problem under user-supplied current constraints. We propose that current constraints are the right kind of abstraction to use in order to develop a practical methodology for power grid verification. We present our verification approach, and report on the results of applying it to a number of test-case power grids.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Abhijit Dharchoudhury , Rajendran Panda , David Blaauw , Ravi Vaidyanathan , Bogdan Tutuianu , David Bearden, Design and analysis of power distribution networks in PowerPC microprocessors, Proceedings of the 35th annual conference on Design automation, p.738-743, June 15-19, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/277044.277229]
|
 |
2
|
Gregory Steele , David Overhauser , Steffen Rochel , Syed Zakir Hussain, Full-chip verification methods for DSM power distribution systems, Proceedings of the 35th annual conference on Design automation, p.744-749, June 15-19, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/277044.277231]
|
 |
3
|
Min Zhao , Rajendran V. Panda , Sachin S. Sapatnekar , Tim Edwards , Rajat Chaudhry , David Blaauw, Hierarchical analysis of power distribution networks, Proceedings of the 37th conference on Design automation, p.150-155, June 05-09, 2000, Los Angeles, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/337292.337355]
|
| |
4
|
L. T. Pillage, R. A. Rohrer, and C. Visweswaraiah. Electronic Circuit and System Simulation Methods. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1995.
|
| |
5
|
G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
|
| |
6
|
A. Berman and R. J. Plemmons. Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Science. Academic Press, New York, 1996.
|
| |
7
|
H. Kriplani, F. N. Najm, and I. Hajj. Pattern independent maximum current estimation in power and ground buses of CMOS VLSI circuits: algorithms, signal correlations, and their resolution. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design, 14(8):998--1012, August 1995.
|
| |
8
|
Jorge Rubenstein, Paul Penfield, and Mark A. Horowitz. Signal delay in RC tree networks. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, 2(3):202--211, July 1983.
|
| |
9
|
D. G. Luenberger. Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2nd edition, 1984.
|
|