ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Piazza: data management infrastructure for semantic web applications
Full text PdfPdf (259 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Scaling up the semantic web table of contents
Pages: 556 - 567  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-680-3
Authors
Alon Y. Halevy  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Zachary G. Ives  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Peter Mork  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Igor Tatarinov  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 146,   Citation Count: 37
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/775152.775231
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Semantic Web envisions a World Wide Web in which data is described with rich semantics and applications can pose complex queries. To this point, researchers have defined new languages for specifying meanings for concepts and developed techniques for reasoning about them, using RDF as the data model. To flourish, the Semantic Web needs to be able to accommodate the huge amounts of existing data and the applications operating on them. To achieve this, we are faced with two problems. First, most of the world's data is available not in RDF but in XML; XML and the applications consuming it rely not only on the domain structure of the data, but also on its document structure. Hence, to provide interoperability between such sources, we must map between both their domain structures and their document structures. Second, data management practitioners often prefer to exchange data through local point-to-point data translations, rather than mapping to common mediated schemas or ontologies.This paper describes the Piazza system, which addresses these challenges. Piazza offers a language for mediating between data sources on the Semantic Web, which maps both the domain structure and document structure. Piazza also enables interoperation of XML data with RDF data that is accompanied by rich OWL ontologies. Mappings in Piazza are provided at a local scale between small sets of nodes, and our query answering algorithm is able to chain sets mappings together to obtain relevant data from across the Piazza network. We also describe an implemented scenario in Piazza and the lessons we learned from it.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, May 2001.
 
5
P. A. Bernstein, F. Giunchiglia, A. Kementsietsidis, J. Mylopoulos, L. Serafini, and I. Zaihrayeu. Data management for peer-to-peer computing: A vision. In ACM SIGMOD WebDB Workshop '02, June 2002.
 
6
S. Boag, D. Chamberlin, M. F. Fernandez, D. Florescu, J. Robie, J. Simeon, and M. Stefanescu. XQuery 1.0: An XML query language. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/, 30 April 2002. W3C working draft.
 
7
 
8
 
9
M. Dean, D. Connolly, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. McGuinness, P. Patel-Schneider, and L. Stein. OWL web ontology language 1.0 reference, 2002. Manuscript available from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/.
 
10
11
12
 
13
M. Fernandez, W.-C. Tan, and D. Suciu. SilkRoute: Trading between relations and XML. In Ninth International World Wide Web Conference, November 1999.
 
14
A. Halevy, O. Etzioni, A. Doan, Z. Ives, J. Madhavan, L. McDowell, and I. Tatarinov. Crossing the structure chasm. In Proceedings of the First Biennian Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), 2003.
 
15
 
16
A. Y. Halevy, Z. G. Ives, D. Suciu, and I. Tatarinov. Schema mediation in peer data management systems. In Proc. of ICDE, 2003.
 
17
I. Horrocks, F. van Harmelen, and P. Patel-Schneider. DAML+OIL. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html, March 2001.
 
18
 
19
V. Kashyap. The semantic web: Has the db community missed the bus (again)? In Proceedings of the NSF Workshop on DB & IS Research on the Semantic Web and Enterprises, Amicalola, GA, 2002.
 
20
D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Source inconsistency and incompleteness in data integration. In KRDB '02, April 2002.
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
E. Mena, V. Kashyap, A. Illarramendi, and A. P. Sheth. Imprecise answers in distributed environments: Estimation of information loss for multi-ontology based query processing. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 9(4):403--425, 2000.
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
D. D. Roure, I. Foster, E. Miller, J. Hendler, and C. Goble. The semantic grid: The grid meets the semantic web. Panel at the WWW Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2002.
 
31
32
 
33

CITED BY  38

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alon Y. Halevy: colleagues
Zachary G. Ives: colleagues
Peter Mork: colleagues
Igor Tatarinov: colleagues