Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

Traditional intrusion detection systems (IDS) detect attacks by comparing current behavior to signatures of known attacks. One main drawback is the inability of detecting new attacks which do not have known signatures. In this paper we propose a learning algorithm that constructs models of normal behavior from attack-free network traffic. Behavior that deviates from the learned normal model signals possible novel attacks. Our IDS is unique in two respects. First, it is nonstationary, modeling probabilities based on the time since the last event rather than on average rate. This prevents alarm floods. Second, the IDS learns protocol vocabularies (at the data link through application layers) in order to detect unknown attacks that attempt to exploit implementation errors in poorly tested features of the target software. On the 1999 DARPA IDS evaluation data set [9], we detect 70 of 180 attacks (with 100 false alarms), about evenly divided between user behavioral anomalies (IP addresses and ports, as modeled by most other systems) and protocol anomalies. Because our methods are unconventional there is a significant non-overlap of our IDS with the original DARPA participants, which implies that they could be combined to increase coverage.

REFERENCES

• 1: Anderson, Debra, Teresa F. Lunt, Harold Javitz, Ann Tamaru, Alfonso Valdes, "Detecting unusual program behavior using the statistical component of the Next-generation Intrusion Detection Expert System (NIDES)", Computer Science Laboratory SRI-CSL 95--06 May 1995. http://www.srl.sfi.com/papers/5/s/5sri/5sri.pdf
• 2: Timothy Bell , Ian H. Witten , John G. Cleary, Modeling for text compression, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.21 n.4, p.557-591, Dec. 1989 [doi>10.1145/76894.76896]
• 3: Barbará, D., N. Wu, S. Jajodia, "Detecting Novel Network Intrusions using Bayes Estimators", First SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2001, http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm01/pdf/sdm01_29.pdf
• 4: Sally Floyd , Vern Paxson, Difficulties in simulating the internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), v.9 n.4, p.392-403, August 2001 [doi>10.1109/90.944338]
• 5: Stephanie Forrest , Steven A. Hofmeyr , Anil Somayaji , Thomas A. Longstaff, A Sense of Self for Unix Processes, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, p.120, May 06-08, 1996
• 6: Anup K. Ghosh , Aaron Schwartzbard , Michael Schatz, Learning Program Behavior Profiles for Intrusion Detection, Proceedings of the Workshop on Intrusion Detection and Network Monitoring, p.51-62, April 09-12, 1999
• 7: M. Handley, C. Kreibich and V. Paxson, "Network Intrusion Detection: Evasion, Traffic Normalization, and End-to-End Protocol Semantics", Proc. USENIX Security Symposium, 2001.
• 8: Kendall, Kristopher, "A Database of Computer Attacks for the Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems", Masters Thesis, MIT, 1999.
• 9: Richard Lippmann , Joshua W. Haines , David J. Fried , Jonathan Korba , Kumar Das, The 1999 DARPA off-line intrusion detection evaluation, Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, v.34 n.4, p.579-595, Oct. 2000 [doi>10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00139-0]
• 10: Mahoney, M., P. K. Chan, "PHAD: Packet Header Anomaly Detection for Identifying Hostile Network Traffic", Florida Tech. technical report 2001--04, http://cs.fit.edu/~tr/
• 11: Peter G. Neumann , Phillip A. Porras, Experience with EMERALD to Date, Proceedings of the Workshop on Intrusion Detection and Network Monitoring, p.73-80, April 09-12, 1999
• 12: Paxson, Vern, "Bro: A System for Detecting Network Intruders in Real-Time", Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Proceedings, 7'th USENIX Security Symposium, Jan. 26--29, 1998, San Antonio TX, http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec98/paxson.html
• 13: Vern Paxson , Sally Floyd, Wide area traffic: the failure of Poisson modeling, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), v.3 n.3, p.226-244, June 1995 [doi>10.1109/90.392383]
• 14: Ptacek, Thomas H., and Timothy N. Newsham, "Insertion, Evasion, and Denial of Service: Eluding Network Intrusion Detection", January, 1998, http://www.robertgraham.com/mirror/Ptacek-Newsham-Evasion-98.html
• 15: Martin Roesch, Snort - Lightweight Intrusion Detection for Networks, Proceedings of the 13th USENIX conference on System administration, November 07-12, 1999, Seattle, Washington
• 16: Sasha/Beetle, "A Strict Anomaly Detection Model for IDS", Phrack 56(11), 2000, http://www.phrack.org
• 17: R. Sekar , M. Bendre , D. Dhurjati , P. Bollineni, A Fast Automaton-Based Method for Detecting Anomalous Program Behaviors, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, p.144, May 14-16, 2001
• 18: SPADE, Silicon Defense, http://www.silicondefense.com/software/spice/

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.0 General
          Subjects: Security and protection (e.g., firewalls)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.7 Database Administration
          Subjects: Security, integrity, and protection

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.5 Security and Protection (D.4.6, K.4.2)
          Subjects: Unauthorized access (e.g., hacking, phreaking)

General Terms:
Experimentation, Performance, Security