ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
DELI: a new run-time control point
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site PdfPdf (1.27 MB)
Source International Symposium on Microarchitecture archive
Proceedings of the 35th annual ACM/IEEE international symposium on Microarchitecture table of contents
Istanbul, Turkey
SESSION: Compilation and run-time systems table of contents
Pages: 257 - 268  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN ~ ISSN:1072-4451 , 0-7695-1859-1
Authors
Giuseppe Desoli  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Cambridge, MA
Nikolay Mateev  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Cambridge, MA
Evelyn Duesterwald  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Cambridge, MA
Paolo Faraboschi  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Cambridge, MA
Joseph A. Fisher  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
SIGMICRO: ACM Special Interest Group on Microarchitectural Research and Processing
: IEEE TC-uArch
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society Press  Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

The Dynamic Execution Layer Interface (DELl) offers the following unique capability: it provides fine-grain control over the execution of programs, by allowing its clients to observe and optionally manipulate every single instruction---at run time---just before it runs. DELl accomplishes this by opening up an interface to the layer between the execution of software and hardware. To avoid the slowdown, DELl caches a private copy of the executed code and always runs out of its own private cache.In addition to giving powerful control to clients, DELl opens up caching and linking to ordinary emulators and just-in-time compilers, which then get the reuse benefits of the same mechanism. For example, emulators themselves can also use other clients, to mix emulation with already existing services, native code, and other emulators.This paper describes the basic aspects of DELl, including the underlying caching and linking mechanism, the Hardware Abstraction Mechanism (HAM), the Binary-Level Translation (BLT) infrastructure, and the Application Programming interface (API) exposed to the clients. We also cover some of the services that clients could offer through the DELl, such as ISA emulation, software patching, and sandboxing. Finally, we consider a case study of emulation in detail: the emulation of a PocketPC system on the Lx/ST210 embedded VLIW processor. In this case, DELl enables us to achieve near-native performance, and to mix-and-match native and emulated code.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
T. Baji, N. Kawashimo, I. Kawasaki, and K. Noguchi. SuperH and SuperH-DSP Microprocessors for the Mobile Computing Age. Hitachi Review, Vol. 46 No. 1. Feb 1997.
 
4
 
5
F. Chang, A. Itzkovitz, and V. Karamcheti. User-level Resource-Constrained Sandboxing. 4th USENIX Windows Systems Symposium, August 2000.
 
6
W. Chen, S. Lerner, R. Chaiken, and D. Gillies. Mojo: A dynamic optimization system. In Proc. 3rd Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization, Dec. 2000.
 
7
R.F. Cmelik and D. Keppel. Shade: a fast instruction set simulator for execution profiling. TR UWCSE-93-06-06, Dept. Comp. Science and Eng., Univ. Washington. 1993
 
8
D. Deaver, R. Gorton, and N. Rubin. Wiggins/Redstone: An on-line program specializer. In Hot Chips 11, Palo Alto, CA, Aug. 1999.
 
9
D. Ditzel. Transmeta's Crusoe: Cool chips for mobile computing. In Hot Chips 12: Stanford University. Aug. 2000.
 
10
"DynamoRlO" <u>http://www.cag.lcs.mit.edu/dynamorio/</u>
11
 
12
K. Ebcioglu, E.R. Altman, E. Hokenek. A JAVA ILP Machine Based on Fast Dynamic Compilation. IEEE MASCOTS International Workshop on Security and Efficiency Aspects of Java. Eilat, Israel, January 9--10, 1997.
13
 
14
P. Faraboschi, F. Homewood, ST200: A VLIW Architecture for Media-Oriented Applications, Microprocessor Forum 2000, October 9--13 2000, San Jose, CA
 
15
J. Fisher. Trace scheduling: a technique for global microcode compaction. IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. 30, no. 9, 1981, pp. 478--490.
 
16
 
17
 
18
M.R. Guthaus, J.S. Ringenberg, D. Ernst, T.M. Austin, T. Mudge and R.B. Brown. MiBench: A Free, Commercially Representative Embedded Benchmark Suite. 4th Workshop on Workload Characterization, Dec. 2001, Austin, TX
 
19
H. Maejima, M. Kainaga, K. Uchiyama. Design and architecture for low-power/high-speed RISC microprocessor: SuperH. IEICE Trans. on Electronics. Vol. E80-C, No. 12. Dec. 1997.
 
20
A. Klaiber. The Technology Behind Crusoe Processors. © 2000 Transmeta Corp. Available as: <u>www.transmeta.com/pdf/white papers/paper aklaiber_19jan00.pdf</u>
 
21
22
 
23
Microsoft Corp. .NET specifications. Available at <u>http :www.microsoft.com/net/</u>
 
24
A. Robinson. Why Dynamic Translation? © 2001 Transitive Technologies. Available as: <u>http:www.transitives.com/downloads/Why Dynamic Translation1.pdf</u>
 
25
 
26
K. Scott, J. Davidson. Strata: a software dynamic translation infrastructure. Proc. Workshop on Binary Translation, 2000.
 
27
A. Srivastava H. Edwards, H. Vo. Vulcan: Binary translation in a distributed environment. Technical Report MSRTR-2001-50, Microsoft Research, 2001.
28
29
30

CITED BY  32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Giuseppe Desoli: colleagues
Nikolay Mateev: colleagues
Evelyn Duesterwald: colleagues
Paolo Faraboschi: colleagues
Joseph A. Fisher: colleagues