ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
3D representations for software visualization
Full text PdfPdf (3.06 MB)
Source Software Visualization archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization table of contents
San Diego, California
SESSION: Interesting program representations table of contents
Pages: 27 - ff  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-642-0
Authors
Andrian Marcus  Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
Louis Feng  Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
Jonathan I. Maletic  Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
Sponsors
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 41,   Downloads (12 Months): 304,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/774833.774837
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The paper presents a new 3D representation for visualizing large software systems. The origins of this representation can be directly traced to the SeeSoft metaphor. This work extends these visualization mechanisms by utilizing the third dimension, texture, abstraction mechanism, and by supporting new manipulation techniques and user interfaces. By utilizing a 3D representation we can better represent higher dimensional data than previous 2D views. An overview of our prototype tool and its basic functionality is given. Applications of this method to particular software engineering tasks are also discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
COIN3D. 2002. Coin3D. Webpage, Date Accessed: 12/2002, <u>http://www.coin3d.org.</u>
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
8
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
JONES, J. A., HARROLD, M. J., and STASKO, J. T. 2001. Visualization for Fault Localization. in Proceedings of ICSE 2001 Workshop on Software Visualization, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp. 71--75.
 
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
PRICE, B. A., BAECKER, R. M., and SMALL, I. S. 1993. A Principled Taxonomy of Software Visualization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 211--266.
 
20
REISS, S. P. 2001. Bee/Hive: A Software Visualization Back End. in Proceedings of ICSE 2001 Workshop on Software Visualization, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp. 44--48.
 
21
 
22
23
 
24
 
25
TROLLTECH. 2002. Trolltech - Qt - Overview. Webpage, <u>http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/.</u>
 
26
 
27
 
28
WARE, C. and FRANCK, G. 1994. Viewing a Graph in a Virtual Reality Display is Three Times as Good as a 2D Diagram. in Proceedings of IEEE Visual Languages, pp. 182--183.
 
29
 
30
WERNECKE, J. 1994. The Inventor Mentor. 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
 
31

CITED BY  19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrian Marcus: colleagues
Louis Feng: colleagues
Jonathan I. Maletic: colleagues