ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Power efficiency of voltage scaling in multiple clock, multiple voltage cores
Full text PdfPdf (155 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design table of contents
San Jose, California
Pages: 379 - 386  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN ~ ISSN:1092-3152 , 0-7803-7607-2
Authors
Anoop Iyer  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Diana Marculescu  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
: IEEE Circuits & Systems Society
IEEE-CS\DATC : IEEE Computer Society
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/774572.774629
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Due to increasing clock speeds, increasing design sizes and shrinking technologies, it is becoming more and more challenging to distribute a single global clock throughout a chip. In this paper we study the effect of using a Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous (GALS) organization for a superscalar, out-of-order processor, both in terms of power and performance. To this end, we propose a novel modeling and simulation environment for multiple clock cores with static or dynamically variable voltages for each synchronous block. Using this design exploration environment we were able to assess the power/performance tradeoffs available for Multiple Clock, Single Voltage (MCSV), as well as Multiple Clock, Dynamic Voltage (MCDV) cores. Our results show that MCSV processors are 10% more power efficient when compared to single-clock single voltage designs with a performance penalty of about 10%. By exploiting the flexibility of independent dynamic voltage scaling the various clock domains, the power efficiency of GALS designs can be improved by 12% on average, and up to 20% more in select cases. The power efficiency of MCDV cores becomes comparable with the one of Single Clock, Dynamic Voltage (SCDV) cores, while being up to 8% better in some cases. Our results show that MCDV cores consume 22% less power at an average 12% performance loss.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
R. Ronen, A. Mendelson, K. Lai, L. Shih-Lien, F. Pollack, and J. P. Shen, "Coming Challenges in Architecture and Microarchitecture," Proceedings of the IEEE, March 2001.
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
G. Qu et al., "Energy Minimization of System Pipelines Using Multiple Voltages," in IEEE Intl. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, 1999.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
P. E. Gronowski, W. J. Bowhill, and R. P. Preston, "High-Performance Microprocessor Design," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, May 1998.
 
17
P. J. Restle et al., "A Clock Distribution Network for Microprocessors," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits (JSSC), May 2001.
 
18
S. Tam, S. Rusu, U. N. Desai, R. Kim, J. Zhang, and I. Young, "Clock Generation and Distribution for the First IA-64 Microprocessor," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits (JSSC), November 2000.
 
19
K. Chen and C. Hu, "Performance and Vdd Scaling in Deep Submicrometer CMOS," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits (JSSC), October 1998.
20
 
21
D. W. Bailey and B. J. Benschneider, "Clocking Design and Analysis for a 600-MHz Alpha Microprocessor," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits (JSSC), Nov 1998.
22
23

CITED BY  18

Collaborative Colleagues:
Anoop Iyer: colleagues
Diana Marculescu: colleagues