ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Methods for true power minimization
Full text PdfPdf (506 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design table of contents
San Jose, California
Pages: 35 - 42  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN ~ ISSN:1092-3152 , 0-7803-7607-2
Authors
Robert W. Brodersen  University of California, Berkeley
Mark A. Horowitz  Stanford University
Dejan Markovic  University of California, Berkeley
Borivoje Nikolic  University of California, Berkeley
Vladimir Stojanovic  Stanford University
Sponsors
: IEEE Circuits & Systems Society
IEEE-CS\DATC : IEEE Computer Society
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 85,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/774572.774578
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents methods for efficient power minimization at circuit and micro-architectural levels. The potential energy savings are strongly related to the energy profile of a circuit. These savings are obtained by using gate sizing, supply voltage, and threshold voltage optimization, to minimize energy consumption subject to a delay constraint. The true power minimization is achieved when the energy reduction potentials of all tuning variables are balanced. We derive the sensitivity of energy to delay for each of the tuning variables connecting its energy saving potential to the physical properties of the circuit. This helps to develop understanding of optimization performance and identify the most efficient techniques for energy reduction. The optimizations are applied to some examples that span typical circuit topologies including inverter chains, SRAM decoders, and adders. At a delay of 20% larger than the minimum, energy savings of 40% to 70% are possible, indicating that achieving peak performance is expensive in terms of energy. Energy savings of about 50% can be achieved without delay penalty with the balancing of sizes, supplies, and thresholds.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P.M. Kogge and H.S. Stone, "A Parallel Algorithm for the Efficient Solution of General Class of Recurrence Equations," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. C-22, no. 8, pp. 786--793, Aug 1973.
 
2
H.C. Lin and L.W. Linholm, "An Optimized Output Stage for MOS Integrated Circuits," IEEE JSSC, vol. SC-10, no. 2, pp. 106--109, Apr. 1975.
 
3
C. Mead and L. Conway, "Introduction to VLSI Design," Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
 
4
J.P. Fishburn and A.E. Dunlop, "TILOS: a posynomial programming approach to transistor sizing," in Proc. ICCAD, Nov. 1985, pp. 326--328.
 
5
T. Sakurai and R. Newton, "Alpha-Power Law MOSFET Model and its Applications to CMOS Inverter Delay and Other Formulas," IEEE JSSC, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 584--594, Apr. 1990.
 
6
A.P. Chandrakasan and R.W. Brodersen, "Low-power CMOS digital design," IEEE JSSC, pp. 473--484, vol. 27, no. 4, Apr. 1992.
 
7
D. Liu and C. Svensson, "Trading Speed for Low Power by Choice of Supply and Threshold Voltage," IEEE JSSC, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 10--17, Jan. 1993.
 
8
S. Ma and P. Franzon, "Energy Control and Accurate Delay Estimation in the Design of CMOS Buffers," IEEE JSSC, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1150--1153, Sept. 1994.
 
9
R. Gonzalez, B. Gordon, and M.A. Horowitz, "Supply and Threshold Voltage Scaling for Low Power CMOS," IEEE JSSC, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1210--1216, Aug. 1997.
 
10
T. Kuroda et al., "Variable Supply-Voltage Scheme for Low-Power High-Speed CMOS Digital Design," IEEE JSSC, pp. 454--462, vol. 33, no. 3, Mar. 1998.
11
 
12
 
13
T.Burd et al., "Dynamic Voltage Scaled Microprocessor System," in Proc. ISSCC, Feb. 2000, pp. 294--295.
14
 
15
M Hamada, Y. Ootaguro, and T. Kuroda, "Utilizing Surplus Timing for Power Reduction," in Proc. CICC, May 2001, pp. 89--92.
 
16
 
17
J. Tschanz et al., "Design optimizations of a high performance microprocessor using combinations of dual-VT allocation and transistor sizing," in Proc. Symp. VLSI, June 2002, pp. 218--219.
18
 
19
V. Stojanovic, D. Markovic, B. Nikolic, M. Horowitz, R. Brodersen, "Energy-Delay Tradeoffs in Combinational Logic using Gate Sizing and Supply Voltage Optimization," to appear in Proc. ESSCIRC, Sept. 2002.

CITED BY  17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert W. Brodersen: colleagues
Mark A. Horowitz: colleagues
Dejan Markovic: colleagues
Borivoje Nikolic: colleagues
Vladimir Stojanovic: colleagues