ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How scalable is J2EE technology?
Full text PdfPdf (315 KB)
Source ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 28 ,  Issue 3  (May 2003) table of contents
SECTION: Article abstracts with full text online table of contents
Pages: 4 - 4  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0163-5948
Authors
Paul Brebner  CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences
Jeffrey Gosper  CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/773126.773139
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

ECperf, the widely recognized industry standard J2EE benchmark, has attracted a large number of results submissions and their subsequent publication. However, ECperf places little restriction on the hardware platform, operating systems and databases utilized in the benchmarking process. This, combined with the existence of only two primary metrics, makes it difficult to answer critical questions such as "Is there a limit to J2EE scalability?" and "Is scale-up or scale-out more effective?". By mining the full-disclosure archives for trends and correlations we have discovered that J2EE technology is very scalable, both in a scale-up and scale-out manner. Other observed trends include, a linear correlation between middle-tier total processing power and throughput, as well as between J2EE Application Server license costs and throughput. However, the results clearly indicate that there is an increasing cost per user with increasing capacity systems, and scale-up is proportionately more expensive than scale-out.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ECperf Specification and Kit, <u>http://java.sun.com/j2ee/ecperf/</u>
 
2
ECperf results: <u>www.theserverside.com/ecperf</u>
 
3
JSR 4 -- ECperf Benchmark Specification, <u>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=004</u>
 
4
J2EE compatibility, <u>http://java.sun.com/j2ee/compatibility.html</u>
 
5
JBoss ECperf kit from CSIRO, <u>http://www.cmis.csiro.au/adsat/jbossecperf.htm</u>
 
6
Paul Brebner et al, Evaluating J2EE Application Servers, CSIRO MTE Report, CSIRO Publishing and Cutter Consortium, 2002: <u>http://www.cmis.csiro.au/adsat/j2eev2.htm</u>
 
7
Nile benchmark, <u>http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/compare/Nile%20Benchmark%20 Results.doc</u>
 
8
NASDAQ transaction rate, <u>http://www.nasdaqnews.com/news/pr2002/ne_section02_165.html</u>
 
9
TPC-C analysis, <u>http://www.benchmarkresources.com/handbook/chapter12.pdf</u>
 
10
Gunther, N, Commerical Clusters and Scalability, at: <u>http://www.teamquest.com/html/gunther/scalability.shtml</u>
 
11
Brebner, P, "Is your AppServer being Crippled by the JVM?", in proceedings of: BorCon2002, 5th Annual Asia Pacific Borland Conference, Australia, Sydney.
 
12
SPEC ™ Information: <u>http://www.spec.org/spec/trademarks.html</u>
 
13
SPECjAppServer2001: <u>http://www.spec.org/osg/jAppServer2001/</u>
 
14
Samuel D. Kounev and Alejandro P. Buchmann, Implementing and Optimising Sun's ECperf Benchmark with WebLogic Server, BEA Technology Conference, 14 November 2001, Frankfurt: <u>http://de.bea.com/events/techkonf2001/presentations/pdf/hik_2c.pdf</u>
 
15
Samuel D. Kounev, Eliminating ECperf Persistence Bottlenecks when using RDBMS with Pessimistic Concurrency Control, <u>http://www.dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/DVS1/staff/skounev/pub/ecperf1.0-opt-proposal.pdf</u>
 
16
Samuel D. Kounev and Alejandro P. Buchmann, Performance Issues in E-Business Systems, in: SSGRR 2002W (International Conference on Advances in Infrastructure for e-Business, e-Education, e-Science, e-Medicine, and Mobile Technologies on the Internet): <u>http://www.ssgrr.it/en/ssgrr2002w/papers/1.pdf</u>
 
17
Samuel D. Kounev and Alejandro P. Buchmann, Improving Data Access of J2EE Applications by Exploiting Asynchronous Messaging and Caching Services, in: VLDB 2002: <u>http://www.cs.ust.hk/vldb2002/VLDB2002-papers/S16P03.pdf</u>
 
18
Samuel D. Kounev, Eliminating ECperf Persistence Bottlenecks when using RDBMS with Pessimistic Concurrency Control, <u>http://www.dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/DVS1/staff/skounev/pub/ecperf1.0-opt-proposal.pdf</u>
 
19
 
20
 
21
SPEC: <u>http://www.benchmarkresources.com/handbook/chapter9.pdf</u>
 
22
ECperf: <u>http://www.jinspired.com/products/jdbinsight/ecperfuncovered.pdf</u>
 
23
Shanti Subramanyam, Ramesh Ramachandran and Akara Sucharitakul, Performance Analysis and Tuning of the Java™ 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE™), Java One, 2001 and 2002, San Francisco.
 
24
Ricardo Morin, Hardeep Reehal, and Kumar Shiv, Java™ 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) Performance Evaluation Workloads--Analysis and Lessons Learned, JavaOne 2002, San Francisco
 
25
 
26
EJB Benchmarking: <u>http://nenya.ms.mff.cuni.cz/~prochazk/papers/TREJBComp.pdf</u>
 
27
2002 WebSphere eBU (Trade2, ECperf and other benchmarks): <u>http://www-900.ibm.com/developerWorks/cn/wsdd/download/pdf/ws-ebu/scene4-perfscal-ch.pdf</u>
 
28
Martin Karlsson, Kevin E. Moore, Erik Hagersten, and David A. Wood, Memory Characterization of the ECperf Benchmark, <u>http://www.cs.wisc.edu/multifacet/papers/WMPI02_ECperfSEQ1 2.pdf</u>
 
29
 
30


Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul Brebner: colleagues
Jeffrey Gosper: colleagues