Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

The Common Language Runtime (CLR) is language and platform-neutral, and provides the underlying infrastructure for the Microsoft .NET Framework. A key innovation in the CLR is its support for multiple programming languages, enabling programming language integration at the runtime level to a much greater degree than is currently possible.

REFERENCES

• 1: Nick Benton , Andrew Kennedy , George Russell, Compiling standard ML to Java bytecodes, Proceedings of the third ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, p.129-140, September 26-29, 1998, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
• 2: Nick Benton , Andrew Kennedy, Interlanguage working without tears: blending SML with Java, Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, p.126-137, September 27-29, 1999, Paris, France
• 3: Benton, N. Private correspondence, November 2000.
• 4: Bothner, P. "Byte-compilation of Scheme using Java byte-codes", <u>http://www.mit.edu/afs/sipb/project/kawa/doc/scm2java.html</u>.
• 5: Box, D. "The Component Object Model and Some Other Model: A comparison of technologies revisited yet again", unpublished paper.
• 6: Don Box , Grady Booch , Charlie Kindel, Essential COM, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1997
• 7: The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification. Farmingham, MA: Object Management Group, 1992
• 8: Danforth, S., P. Koenen, and B. Tate, Objects for 0S/2. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994.
• 9: Dowd, T., F. Henderson, and P. Ross, "Compiling Mercury to the .NET Common Language Runtime" in BABEL'01: First International Workshop on Multi-Language Infrastructure and Interoperability, September 2001.
• 10: Eckel, B. "Appendix A: Using non-Java Code", Thinking in Java, <u>http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~cdong/AppendixA.html</u>
• 11: ECMA-334 C# Language Specification, ECMA, December 2001.
• 12: ECMA-335 Common Language Infrastructure (CLI), ECMA, December 2001.
• 13: N. I. Adams, IV , D. H. Bartley , G. Brooks , R. K. Dybvig , D. P. Friedman , R. Halstead , C. Hanson , C. T. Haynes , E. Kohlbecker , D. Oxley , K. M. Pitman , G. J. Rozas , G. L. Steele, Jr. , G. J. Sussman , M. Wand , H. Abelson, Revised5 report on the algorithmic language scheme, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.33 n.9, p.26-76, Sept. 1, 1998 [doi>10.1145/290229.290234]
• 14: Gutknecht, J. "Active Oberon for .NET: An Exercise in Object Model Mapping" In BABEL '01: First International Workshop on Multi-Language Infrastructure and Interoperability, September 2001.
• 15: Hamilton, J. "Reusing Binary Objects with DirectToSOM C++", C++ Report, March 1996.
• 16: Hamilton, J. "Interlanguage Object Sharing with SOM", Proceedings of the 1996 USENIX Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies, 1996.
• 17: Jennifer Hamilton, Programming with DirectToSOM C++, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1996
• 18: Harper, R. "Functionals", Programming in Standard ML <u>http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/usr/rwh/public/www/introsml/core/functionals.htm</u>
• 19: Hudak, P., J. Peterson, and J. Fasel, "Functions", A Gentle Introduction To Haskell, <u>http://www.haskell.org/tutorial/functions.html</u>
• 20: IBM, "The System Object Model (SOM) and the Component Object Model (COM): A comparison of technologies from a developer's perspective", <u>http://www-4.ibm.com/software/ad/som/library/somvscom.html</u>
• 21: Jones, S., Ramsey, N., and F.Reig, "C-: a portable assembly language that supports garbage collection", <u>http://www.cminusminus.org/abstracts/ppdp.html</u>
• 22: Andrew Kennedy , Don Syme, Design and implementation of generics for the .NET Common language runtime, Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2001 conference on Programming language design and implementation, p.1-12, June 2001, Snowbird, Utah, United States
• 23: .NET framework security, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2002
• 24: Tim Lindholm , Frank Yellin, Java Virtual Machine Specification, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 25: Barbara Liskov , Mark Day , Sanjay Ghemawat , Robert Gruber , Umesh Maheshwari , Andrew C. Myers , Liuba Shrira, The language-independent interface of the Thor persistent object system, Object-oriented multidatabase systems: a solution for advanced applications, Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK, 1995
• 26: "Mercury on Microsoft's .NET Framework", <u>http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/mercury/information/dotnet/mercury and dotnet.htmls</u>
• 27: Microsoft .NET Language partners, <u>http://www.msdn.Microsoft Corporation.com/vstudio/partners/language/default.asp</u>
• 28: Miller, J. "MultiScheme: A Parallel Processing System Based on MIT Scheme", MIT LCS/TR/402
• 29: Morrisett, G., K. Crary, N. Glew, D. Grossman, R. Samuels, F. Smith, D. Walker, S. Weirich, and S. Zdancewic, "TALx86: A Realistic Typed Assembly Language", ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Compiler Support for System Software, 1999.
• 30: Joseph A. Bank , Andrew C. Myers , Barbara Liskov, Parameterized types for Java, Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, p.132-145, January 15-17, 1997, Paris, France [doi>10.1145/263699.263714]
• 31: .NET Developer Center, <u>http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/net/</u>
• 32: "Programming Languages for the Java Virtual Machine", <u>http://grunge.cs.tuberlin.de/~tolk/vmlanguages.html</u>
• 33: Norman Ramsey , Simon Peyton Jones, A single intermediate language that supports multiple implementations of exceptions, Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2000 conference on Programming language design and implementation, p.285-298, June 18-21, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
• 34: Standard ML, <u>http://research.microsoft.com/Projects/SML.NET/</u>
• 35: Systems Application Architecture: An Overview. IBM GC26-4341
• 36: Syme, D. "ILX: Extending the .NET Common IL for Functional Language Interoperability", in BABEL'01: First International Workshop on Multi-Language Infrastructure and lnteropera bility, September 2001.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
common type system, exception handling, intermediate language, language interoperability, metadata, virtual machine