ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Eliminating definitions and Skolem functions in first-order logic
Full text PdfPdf (126 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 3  (July 2003) table of contents
Pages: 402 - 415  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:1529-3785
Author
Jeremy Avigad  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/772062.772068
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

From proofs in any classical first-order theory that proves the existence of at least two elements, one can eliminate definitions in polynomial time. From proofs in any classical first-order theory strong enough to code finite functions, including sequential theories, one can also eliminate Skolem functions in polynomial time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ajtai, M. 1988. The complexity of the pigeonhole principle. In Proceedings of the IEEE 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Almitos, Calif., 346--355.
 
2
Avigad, J. 1996. Formalizing forcing arguments in subsystems of second-order arithmetic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 82, 2, 165--191.
 
3
Avigad, J. 2000. A realizability interpretation for classical arithmetic. In Logic Colloquium '98 (Prague), Czech Republic Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 13. Association of Symbolic Logic, Urbana, Ill. 57--90.
 
4
Avigad, J. 2001a. Algebraic proofs of cut elimination. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 49, 1-2, 15--30.
 
5
 
6
Avigad, J. 2001c. Weak theories of nonstandard arithmetic and analysis. In Reverse Mathematics 2001, Stephen Simpson, Ed. To appear.
 
7
Clote, P. and Krajíček, J. 1993. Arithmetic, Proof Theory, and Computational Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
 
8
Hájek, P. and Pudlák, P. 1993. Metamathematics of first-order arithmetic. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
 
9
Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P. 1939. Grundlagen der Mathematik. Vol. II. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
 
10
 
11
Paris, J. and Wilkie, A. 1985. Counting problems in bounded arithmetic. In Methods in Mathematical Logic (Caracas, Venezuela), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1130. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 317--340.
 
12
Pudlák, P. 1998. The lengths of proofs. In Handbook of Proof Theory. Stud. Logic Found. Math., vol. 137. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 547--637.
 
13
Schwichtenberg, H. 1979. Logic and the axiom of choice. In Logic Colloquium '78, Maurice Boffa, Dirk van Dalen, and Kenneth McAloon, Eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 351--356.
 
14
Shoenfield, J. R. 2001. Mathematical logic. Association for Symbolic Logic, Urbana, IL. Reprint of the 1973 second printing.
 
15
Takeuti, G. 1987. Proof Theory, 2nd ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
 
16


REVIEW

"Manuel Ojeda Aciego : Reviewer"

A method to schedule offset free systems in a hard real-time context is presented in this paper. After characterizing tasks by their time parameters (period, deadline, requirement, offset), the author addresses the issue of computing the offsets o  more...