ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Color consistency for digital multi-projector stereo display systems: the HEyeWall and the Digital CAVE
Full text PdfPdf (16.19 MB)
Source EGVE; Vol. 39 archive
Proceedings of the workshop on Virtual environments 2003 table of contents
Zurich, Switzerland
Pages: 271 - 279  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-686-2
Authors
W. Kresse  Fraunhofer-IGD, Darmstadt/Germany
D. Reiners  Fraunhofer-IGD, Darmstadt/Germany
C. Knöpfle  Fraunhofer-IGD, Darmstadt/Germany
Sponsor
EUROGRAPH : Eurographics Organization
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/769953.769985
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Digital projectors have a significant advantage over CRTs for IPT setups: brightness. But they also have a number of disadvantages, one of which is color consistency. This problem is exacerbated when using the Infitec method for stereo separation, which in itself has some strong advantages for CAVE and tiled wall setups. In this paper we will describe a method for color and brightness correction of multi-projector display systems. The method itself is used in two new projection systems, which are currently under construction at Fraunhofer-IGD: The HEyewall and the Digital CAVE. The HEyeWall is the first stereo capable tiled display worldwide. The Digital CAVE is the first CAVE with digital projectors and stereo separation based on Infotec(tm). In this paper we present these new IPTs in more detail and also present our experience with digital projectors.To calibrate all the involved projectors photometric measurements of the different projectors are used to calculate a common gamut in a linear colorspace. Input colors are mapped into this gamut and from there mapped into the individual projector's colorspace. This method allows to adjust the rendering output of two or more projectors with different color gamuts in such a way that the projected images are photometrically calibrated. Since the correction has to be done for each pixel, a straightforward implementation would be very slow and far away from realtime. Consequently we will outline a method how to improve performance and overcome this limitation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Han Chen, Grant Wallace, Anoop Gupta, Kai Li, Tom Funkhouser, and Perry Cook. Experiences with scalability of display walls. In IPT2002, 2002.
 
2
3
4
 
5
Paul Woodward et al. Powerwall. http://www.lcse.umn.edu/research/powerwall/powerwall.html, 1994.
 
6
 
7
Gerriets GmbH. Opera milchig matt specifications, 2003.
 
8
 
9
H. Jorke. Infitec - Wellenlängenmultiplex Visual-isierungssysteme, 2002.
 
10
Wolfram Kresse and Dirk Reiners. Can we trust that image? Photometric Attributes of Current Projection Systems. In IPT2002 Proceedings, Orlando, March 2002.
 
11
Wolfram Kresse, Frank Schoeffel, and Stefan Mueller. An autocalibraion tool for the photometric and colorimetric consistency of ipts. In IPT2000, Ames, 2000.
 
12
13
 
14
Charles Poynton. Color technology, 1997.
 
15
16
 
17
Frank Schoeffel, Wolfram Kresse, Matthias Unbescheiden, and Stefan Mueller. Do IPT systems fulfill application requirements? a study on luminance on large-scale immersive projection devices. In IPT1999, Stuttgart, 1999.
 
18
 
19


Collaborative Colleagues:
W. Kresse: colleagues
D. Reiners: colleagues
C. Knöpfle: colleagues