ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A visual simulation model of a workstation in a rolling mill facility
Full text PdfPdf (401 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 21st conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 784 - 789  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-911801-58-8
Authors
Sponsors
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
SES : SES
TIMS/CS :
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
ORSA : Operations Research Society of America
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 4,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/76738.76836
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The objective of this research is to develop a visual simulation model to evaluate the performance of a workstation in a rolling mill facility by analyzing the interactions between the jobs to be processed and the scheduling rules used. The model has been developped using the CINEMA software and executes on a IBM PC/AT microcomputer. The simulation model is currently used to design job scheduling rules and compare their performance in reducing setups, work-in-process inventories and flow time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AMIRY, A. P., 1965, The Simulation of Information Flow in a Steelmaking Plant, Digital Simulation in Operational Research, Hollingdale ed., English University Press, London, England.
 
2
BAKER, K. R., 1976, Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, Wiley.
 
3
CACI, 1987, SIMFACTORY with Animation, 12011 San Vincente Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90049.
 
4
CONWAY, R., W. L. MAXWELL and S. L. WORONA, 1985, User's Guide to XCELL Factory Modeling System, Scientific Press, Palo Alto, CA.
 
5
FIDDY, E., J. G. BRIGHT and R. D. HURRION, 1981, SEE-WHY: Interactive Simulation on the Screen, Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers C293/81, pp. 167--172. GENERAL ELECTRIC, 1986, MODELMASTER Software Description, P. O. Box 8106, Charlottesville, VA.
 
6
GRAVES, S. C., 1981, A Review of Production Scheduling, Operations Research, v 29, pp. 646--675.
 
7
MUSSELMAN, K. J., 1986, TESS as a Catalyst for Change, Paper presented at the TIMS/ORSA Joint National Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
 
8
PANWALKER, S. S. and W. ISKANDER, 1977, A Review of Scheduling Rules, Operations Research, v 25, pp. 45--61.
 
9
PEGDEN, L. A., T. I. MILES and G. A. DIAZ, 1985, Graphical Interpretation of Output Illustrated by a SIMAN Manufacturing Simulation Model, in Proceedings of the 1985 Winter Simulation Conference, The Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA., pp. 244--251.
 
10
RAHN, R. J., 1986, Approaches to Simulation, Paper prsented at the 1986 CORS Conference, Toronto, June 1986.


Collaborative Colleagues:
P. Lefrancois: colleagues
M.-H. Jobin: colleagues
M.-C. Roy: colleagues
G. Gamache: colleagues