ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Limitation of optimism in the time warp operating system
Full text PdfPdf (545 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 21st conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 765 - 770  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-911801-58-8
Authors
Sponsors
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
SES : SES
TIMS/CS :
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
ORSA : Operations Research Society of America
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 27
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/76738.76834
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Optimistic systems execute events out of order and must undo their errors to produce correct results. Undoing incorrect work can be expensive. By restraining their optimism, such systems might execute fewer events out of order and thereby run faster. This paper examines two methods tested in the Time Warp Operating System. The first method explicitly prevents events from executing in the far simulation future. The second method tries to identify objects that are doing work that has to be undone; such objects are allowed to execute less often. Experimental results show that only modest gains were realized, and that even these gains were unpredictable. While other methods remain untested, the value of limiting optimism seems small.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Hontalas, P., Beckman, B., Di Loreto, M., Blume, L., Reiher, P., Sturdevant, K., Warren, L. V., Wedel, J., Wieland, F., Jefferson, D. (1989). Performance of the Colliding Pucks Simulation on the Time Warp Operating System (Part 1: Asynchronous Behavior and Sectoring), Proceedings of the Society for Computer Simulation's 1989 Eastern Multiconference.
 
2
Jefferson, D., Beckman, B., Wieland, F., Blume, L., Di Loreto, M., Hontalas, P., Laroche, P., Sturdevant, K., Tupman, J., Warren, V., Wedel, J., Younger, H., Bellenot, S. (1987). Distributed Simulation and the Time Warp Operating System, ACM Operating System Review, Vol. 20, No. 4.
 
3
Mitra (1985). Personal communications.
 
4
Mitra and Mitrani, (1984). Analysis and Optimum Performance of Two Message-Passing Parallel Processors Synchronized By Rollback, Tenth International Symposium on Computer Performance Modeling, Measurement, and Evaluation.
 
5
Presley, M., Ebling, M., Wieland, F., Jefferson, D. (1989). Benchmarking the Time Warp Operating System With a Computer Network Simulation, Proceedings of the Society for Computer Simulation's 1989 Eastern Multiconference.
 
6
Sokol, L. Stucky, B., Hwang V. (1989). MTW: A Control Mechanism for Parallel Discrete Simulation, Mitre Technical Report MP-89W00008.
 
7
Wieland, F., Hawley, L., Feinberg, A., Di Loreto, M., Blume, L., Ruffles, J., Reiher, P., Beckman, B., Hontalas, P., Bellenot, S., Jefferson, D. (1989). Distributed Combat Simulation and Time Warp: The Model and its Performance, Proceedings of the Society for Computer Simulation's 1989 Eastern Multiconference.

CITED BY  27

Collaborative Colleagues:
P. L. Reiher: colleagues
F. Wieland: colleagues
D. Jefferson: colleagues