ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Paper prototyping - what is it good for?: a comparison of paper- and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping
Full text PdfPdf (149 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
SESSION: Short talks-Specialized section: issues in software development table of contents
Pages: 778 - 779  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-637-4
Authors
Reinhard Sefelin  CURE Center for Usability Research & Engineering, Vienna, Austria
Manfred Tscheligi  CURE Center for Usability Research & Engineering, Vienna, Austria
Verena Giller  CURE Center for Usability Research & Engineering, Vienna, Austria
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 44,   Downloads (12 Months): 272,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/765891.765986
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the differences between computer-based and paper-based low-fidelity prototypes. It researched whether subjects confronted with these two kinds of prototypes differ in their willingness to criticize a system and to give suggestions for its improvement. The chosen approach was an empirical study including test sessions using both kinds of prototypes. Quantitative and qualitative methods were applied to measure and to explain possible differences.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Boling, E. and Frick, T.W. (1997). Holistic rapid prototyping for web design: Early usability testing is essential. In B. Khan (Ed), Web-Based Instruction. (pp. 319--328) Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publication, Inc.
 
2
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis.
 
3
Catani, M.B. and Biers, D.W. (1998). Usability evaluation and prototype fidelity: Users and usability professionals. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 1998.
 
4
 
5
Sefelin, R. (2002). Comparison of paper- and computer-based low-fidelity prototypes. CURE (Technical Report, available from the author).
6
 
7
Wiklund, M., Thurrot, C., Dumas, J. (1992). Does the fidelity of software prototypes affect the perception of usability? Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, 1992.

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Reinhard Sefelin: colleagues
Manfred Tscheligi: colleagues
Verena Giller: colleagues