|
ABSTRACT
Software systems development has been plagued by cost overruns, late deliveries, poor reliability, and user dissatisfaction. This article presents a paradigm for the study of software project management that is grounded in the feedback systems principles of system dynamics.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Abdel-Hamid, T.K. The dynamics of software development project management: An integrative system dynamics perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1984.
|
| |
2
|
Abdel-Hamid, T.K., and Madnick, S.E. Impact of schedule estimation on software project behavior. IEEE Sofiw. 3, 4 (July, 1986).
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Abdel-Hamid, T.K., and Madnick, S.E. The economics of software quality assurance: A systems dynamics based simulation approach. Annals of the Society of l,ogistics Eng. 1, 2 (October 1987b), 8-32.
|
| |
9
|
Abdel-Hamid, T.K., and Madnick, S.E. Dynamics of Software Project Management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: in press, 1990.
|
| |
10
|
Abdel-Hamid, T.K., and Madnick, S.E. Software productivity: Potential, actual, and perceived. Syst. Dynamics Rev. 5, 2 (Sum. 1989), 93-113.
|
| |
11
|
Abdel-Hamid, T.K., and Sivasankaran, T.R. Incorporating expert system technology into simulation modeling: An expert-simulator for project management. In Proceedings of the 1988 Society for Computer Simulation Multiconference, February, 3-5, 1988, pp. 268-274.
|
| |
12
|
Baber, R.L. Software Reflected. North Holland, New York, 1982.
|
| |
13
|
Basili, V.R. Improving methodology and productivity through practical measurement. Lecture at the Wang Institute of Graduate Studies, Lowell, Mass., November, 1982.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Buckley, F., and Poston, R. Software quality assurance. IEEE Trans. Sofiw. Eng. 10, I (Jan. 1984), 36-41.
|
| |
17
|
Cooper, J.D. Corporate level software management. IEEE Trans. Sofiw. Eng. SE-4, No. 4 (July 1978), 319-325.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
DeMarco, T. Controlling Software Projects. Yourdon Press, New York, 1982.
|
| |
20
|
Devenny, T.J. An exploration study of software cost estimating at the electronics systems division. U.S. Department ot' Commerce, July, 1976.
|
| |
21
|
Forrester, J.W. Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1961.
|
| |
22
|
Forrester, J.W., and Senge, P.M. Tests for Building Cor fidence in System Dynamics Models. In A.A. Legasto et al., Eds., Studies in the Management Sciences: System Dynamics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.
|
| |
23
|
Gehring, P.F., and Pooch, V.W. Software development management. Data Manag. (Feb. 1977), 14-38.
|
| |
24
|
Graham, A.K. Software design: Breaking the bottleneck. IEEE Spectrum 19, 3 (Mar. 1982), 43-50.
|
| |
25
|
Ibrahim, R.L. Software development infbrmation system. J. Syst. Manag. 29, 12 (Dec. 1978), 34-39.
|
| |
26
|
Kelly, T.J. The dynamics of R&D project management. Master's thesis, Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1970.
|
 |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
Lehman, M.M. Laws and conservation in large program evaluation. In Proceedings of the Second Software Lifecycle Management Workshop (Atlanta, Ga., Aug. 1978), pp. 21-22.
|
| |
29
|
McGowan, C.L., and McHenry, R.C. Software Management. In P. Wegner, Ed., Research Directions in Software Technolc gy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1980.
|
| |
30
|
McKeen, J.D. Successful development strategies for bu:finess application systems. MIS Q. 7, 3 (Sept. 1983).
|
| |
31
|
Mills, H.D. Software Productivity. Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1983.
|
| |
32
|
Musa, J.D. Software engineering: The future of a pro:{e:;sion. IEEE Sofiw. (Jan. 1985), 55-62.
|
| |
33
|
Nay, J.N. Choice and allocation in multiple markets: A research and development systems analysis. Master's thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, MIT, 1965.
|
| |
34
|
Newport, J.P., Jr. A growing gap in software. Fortune (Apr. 28, 1986), 132-142.
|
| |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
Oliver, P. Estimating the Cost of Software. in J. Hannan, Ed., Computer Programming Management. Auerbach Publishers, Pennsauken, N.J., 1982.
|
| |
37
|
Pietrasanta, A.M. Managing the Economics of Computer Programming. In National Conference Proceedings of the ACM, 1986.
|
| |
38
|
|
| |
39
|
Putnam, L.H. The Real Metrics of Software Development. EASCON 80, 1980.
|
| |
40
|
Radice, A. Productivity Measures in Software. In R. Gcldberg, Ed., The Economics of Information Processing: Operations, Programming, and Software Models. Volume II. Wiley, New York, 1982.
|
| |
41
|
|
| |
42
|
Richardson, G.P. Sources of rising product development times. Tech. Rep. D-3321-1, SD Group, MIT, 1982.
|
| |
43
|
|
| |
44
|
Roberts, E.B. The Dynamics of Research and Development. Harper and Row, New York, 1964.
|
| |
45
|
Roberts, E.B., Ed. Managerial Applications of System Dynamics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.
|
| |
46
|
|
| |
47
|
Steiner, I.D. Group Process and Productivity. Academic: F'ress, New York, 1972.
|
| |
48
|
|
| |
49
|
Weick, K.E. The Social Psychology of Organization. 2nd ed. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1979.
|
| |
50
|
Weiss, D.M. Evaluating software development by error analysis. Syst. Softw. 1, 1 (1979), 57-70.
|
| |
51
|
Zmud, R.W. Management of large software development efforts. MIS Q. 4, 2 (June 1980), 45-56.
|
CITED BY 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Butterfield , Jay G. Cooprider , Sukumar Rathnam, Resolving cognitive conflict in requirements definition: a blackboard-based model and system architecture, Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations, p.105-115, March 24-26, 1994, Alexandria, Virginia, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVIEW
"Eleanor Worley Jordan : Reviewer"
The goal of the authors' research was to improve the management of
software development. The paper begins with the common lament that
software demand far exceeds current development abilities and then
follows with the much less common suggesti
more...
|