An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of the findings

ABSTRACT

A series of three laboratory experiments were conducted to assess the influence of graphical and color-enhanced information presentation modes on decision quality, decision making time, use of information, and user perceptions. The experimental design allowed for the unconfounded study of line graphs and color using a variety of information presentation designs for the same decision making task. Based on the findings of these studies, propositions about the impact of graphics and color on individual decision makers are presented. The influence of presentation mode on human performance and the perceived value of information is related to how well it supports the solution approach to a particular task. The benefits of graphics are limited to reducing decision making time but only when the graphical report has been designed to directly assist in solving the task. Multicolor reports aid in decision making, but only in specific circumstances, that is, their benefits are not pervasive. It appears that color is more advantageous when associated with graphical reports, for certain decision maker types, during learning periods, and in time constrained environments.

REFERENCES

• 1: Benbasat. I., and Dexter, AS. An experimental evaluation of graphical and color enhanced information presentation. Manage. Sri. 31, 11 (Nov. 1985), 1348-1364.
• 2: Benbasat. 1.. and Dexter, AS. An experimental investigation of the effectiveness of graphical and color enhanced information presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Q. 10, 1 (Mar. 1986). 59-83.
• 3: Benbasat, I.. Dexter, AS.. and Todd, P. The influence of color-enhanced and graphical information presentation on report use and decision performance in a simulation supported task. Hum.-Cornput. Interaction 2, 1 (1986), 65-92.
• 4: Benbasat. I., and Taylor. R.N. Behavioral aspects of information processing for the design of management information systems. IEEE f. Syst., Man, Cybern. SMC-12, 4 (July/Aug. 1982). 439-450.
• 5: Benbasat, 1.. and Schroeder, R.G. An experimental investigation of some MIS design variables. MIS Q. 1, 1 (Mar. 1977). 37-49.
• 6: Chervany. N.L., and Dickson, G.W. On the validity of the analyticheuristic instrument utilized in 'The Minnesota experiments': A reply. Manage. Sci. 24. 10 (June 1978). 1091-1092.
• 7: Christ. R.E. Review and analysis of color coding research for visual displays. Hum. Fact. 17. 6 (Dec. 19751, 542-570.
• 8: Chute, A.G. Analysis of the instructional functions of color and monochrome cuing in media presentations. Educ. Commun. Tech. J. 27,4 (Winter 1979), 251-263.
• 9: Cleveland. W.S.. and McGill, R. Graphical perception: Theory. experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. I. Amer. Sfat. Assoc. 69. 387 (Application Section}, 531-554.
• 10: DeSanctis. G. Computer graphics as decision aids: Directions for research. Decis. Sci. 15, 4 (Fall 1984). 463-487.
• 11: Gary W. Dickson , Gerardine DeSanctis , D. J. McBride, Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.1, p.40-47, Jan. 1986 [doi>10.1145/5465.5469]
• 12: Ghani, }.A. The effects of information representation and modification on decision performance. Ph.D. dissertation, Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania, 1981.
• 13: Huber. G.P. Cognitive style as the basis for MIS and DSS designs. Manage. Sci. 29, 5 (May 1983). 567-579.
• 14: Integrated Software Systems Corporation. DISSPL4 User's Manunl, San Diego, Calif. 1978.
• 15: Ishihara, S. Tests for Colour Blindness: 38 Plate Edifion, Kanehara Shuppan Co. Ltd., Tokyo. 1968.
• 16: Ives. B. Graphical user interfaces for business information systems. MIS Q. Special Issue. (Dec. 1982), 15-42.
• 17: Jarvenpaa. S. Formulation, experimental evaluation and application of a task taxonomy for graphic research: A preliminary research proposal. Ph.D. dissertation proposal. Graduate School of Management. Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1985.
• 18: Jenkins, A.M., and Ricketts, J.R. Development of an instrument to measure user satisfaction with management information systems. Working Paper, School of Business. Indiana Univ., Bloomington, 1980.
• 19: Jenkins, A.M.. and Ricketts. J.R. The development of an MIS satisfaction questionnaire: An instrument for evaluating user satisfaction with turnkey decision support systems. Discussion Paper No. 265. School of Business. Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Aug. 1985.
• 20: Lamberski, R.J. A comprehensive and critical review of the methodology and findings in color investigations. Presented at The Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Denver, CO, Apr. 1980.
• 21: Lodish, L. Callplan: An interactive salesman's call planning system. Manage. Sci. 18,4. Part 2 (Dec. 1971). 25-40.
• 22: Lucas. H.C.. and Nielsen, N.R. The impact of the mode of information presentation on learning and performance. Manage. Sci. 26. 10 (Oct. 1980). 982-993.
• 23: Lusk. E.J.. and Kersnick, M. The effect of cognitive style and report format on task performance: The MIS design consequences. Manage. Sci. 25, 8 (Aug. 19791, 787-798.
• 24: McIntyre. S.H. Experimental study of the impact of judgement-based marketing models. Manage. Sci. 28, 1 (Jan. 1982), 17-33.
• 25: Miller, G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63, 2 (Mar. 1956). 81-97.
• 26: Gerald M. Murch, Physiological principles for the effective use of color, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.4 n.11, p.49-54, Nov. 1984
• 27: Allen Newell, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1972
• 28: Remus. W. An empirical investigation of the impact of graphical and tabular data presentations on decision making. Manage. SC;. 30, 5 (May 1984). 533-542.
• 29: Robertson. P.J. A guide to using color on alphanumeric displays. Tech. Rep. 6320-6296-O IBM, New York 1980.
• 30: Schutz. H.G. An evaluation of methods for presentation of graphic multiple trends-Experiment III. Hum. Facf. 3. 2 (July 1961), 108-119.
• 31: Herbert Alexander Simon, The New Science of Management Decision, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1977
• 32: Edward R. Tufte, The visual display of quantitative information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1986
• 33: Wainer. H. How to display data badly. Amer. Stat. 38, 2 (May 1984). 137-147.
• 34: Witkin, H.A.. Goodenough. D.R.. and Karp, S.A. Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood. I Pers. Sot. Psychol. 7, 3 (Nov. 1967). 291-300.
• 35: Witkin. H.A., et al. A Manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Consulting Psychologists Press. Palo klto, Calif., 1971. -
• 36: Zmud. R.W. Individual differences and MIS success. Manage. Sci. 25, 10 (Oct. 1979), 966-979.
• 37: Zmud. R.W., Blocher, E.. and Moffie. R.P. The impact of colour graphic report formats on decision performance and learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems. Houston. Tex.. Dec. 1983,179-193.

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.2 Types of Systems
          Subjects: Decision support (e.g., MIS)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS

General Terms:
Human Factors