ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The revised ARPANET routing metric
Full text PdfPdf (1.30 MB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures & protocols table of contents
Austin, Texas, United States
Pages: 45 - 56  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-332-9
Also published in ...
Authors
A. Khanna  BBN Communications Corporation, 150 CambridgePark Drive, Cambridge, MA
J. Zinky  BBN Communications Corporation, 150 CambridgePark Drive, Cambridge, MA
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 64,   Downloads (12 Months): 165,   Citation Count: 35
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/75246.75252
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The ARPANET routing metric was revised in July 1987, resulting in substantial performance improvements, especially in terms of user delay and effective network capacity. These revisions only affect the individual link costs (or metrics) on which the PSN (packet switching node) bases its routing decisions. They do not affect the SPF (“shortest path first”) algorithm employed to compute routes (installed in May 1979). The previous link metric was packet delay averaged over a ten second interval, which performed effectively under light-to-moderate traffic conditions. However, in heavily loaded networks it led to routing instabilities and wasted link and processor bandwidth. The revised metric constitutes a move away from the strict delay metric: it acts similar to a delay-based metric under lightly loads and to a capacity-based metric under heavy loads. It will not always result in shortest-delay paths. Since the delay metric produced shortest-delay paths only under conditions of light loading, the revised metric involves giving up the guarantee of shortest-delay paths under light traffic conditions for the sake of vastly improved performance under heavy traffic conditions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ARPANET Performance Analysis Report. Quarterly Report 11, BBN, Aug. 1987.
 
2
MILNET Routing Improvements: Measurements and Analysis of the $PF Metric Patch. BBN Report 6719, BBN, Feb. 1988.
 
3
D. P. Bertsekas. Dynamic Behavior of Shortest Path Routing Algorithms for Communication Networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-27:60- 74, Feb. 1982.
 
4
E. W. Dijkstra. A Note on Two Problems in Connection with Graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1:269- 271, 1959.
 
5
 
6
V. Haimo, M. Gardner, I. I_x>obeek, and M. Frishkopf. Multi-Path Routing: Modeling and Simulation. BBN Report 6363, BBN, Sep. 1986.
 
7
A. Khanna. Short-Term Modifications to Routing and Congestion Control. BBN Report 6714, BBN, Feb. 1988.
 
8
J. M. McQuillan, G. Falk, and I. Richer. A Review of the Development and Performance of the ARPANET Routing Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1802-1811, De~c. 1978.
 
9
J. M. McQuillan, I. Richer, and E. C. Rosen. ARPANET Routing Algorithm Improvements: First Semiannual Technical Report. BBN Report 3803, BBN, Apr. 1978.
 
10
J. M. McQuillan, I. Richer, and E. C. Rosen. The New Routing Algorithm for the ARPANET. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 711-719, May 1980.
 
11
J.M. McQuillan, I. Richer, E. C. Rosen, and D. P. Bertsekas. ARPANET Routing Algorithm Improvements: 2nd Semiannual Technical Report. BBN Report 3940, BBN, Oct. 1978.
 
12
J.M. McQuillan, I. Richer, E. C. Rosen, and J. G. Herman. ARPANET Routing Algorithm Improvements: 3rd Semiannual Technical Report. BBN Report 3940, BBN, Oct. 1978.
 
13
E. C. Rosen. The Updating Protocol of ARPANET's New Routing Algorithm. Computer Networks, 4:11- 19, Feb. 1980.
 
14
J. A. Zinky, A. Khanna, and G. Vichniac. Performance of the Revised Routing Metric for ARPANET and MILNET. Submitted to MILCOM 89, March 1989.

CITED BY  35