The effect of a priori views on the social implications of computing: the case of office automation

ABSTRACT

Office automation impact has received considerable attention in the literature recently. Unfortunately, that which has appeared is diverse and contradictory. The relevant literature is reviewed, summarized, and placed in a framework containing three positions on office automation impact: optimism, pessimism, and relativism. The basic assumptions and empirical support for each position are noted and analyzed. It is proposed that these positions are based on a number of a priori views which guide the reporting and beliefs about technological impact.

REFERENCES

• 1: ABRAHAM, S. 1981. The impact of automated office systems on the productivity of managers and professionals. In Proceedings of the Office Automation Conference (Houston, Tex., Mar.).
• 2: ACKOFF, R. 1967. Management misinformation systerns. Manage. Sci. 14, 4 (Dec.).
• 3: ACKOFF, R. 1970. A Concept of Corporate Planning. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
• 4: ACKOFF, R. 1974. Redesigning the Future. Wiley- Interscience, New York.
• 5: ACKOFF, R. 1979. Resurrecting the future of operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 30, 3 (Mar.).
• 6: ACKOFF, R. 1983. An interactive view of rationality. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 34, 8 (Aug.).
• 7: APEL, K. 1980. The explanation: Understanding controversy in transcendental-pragmatic perspective (in German). Theorie-Diskussion. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
• 8: APEX 1979. Office technology: A trade union response. Staff Report, Association of Professional, Executive, Clerical and Computer, London, Mar.
• 9: ARNOLD, E. 1980. Word processing: The job. In Office Automation-Analysis, State of the Art Report, Infotech, London.
• 10: Paul Attewell , James Rule, Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.12, p.1184-1192, Dec. 1984 [doi>10.1145/2135.2136]
• 11: AYRES, R., AND MILLER, S. 1982. Industrial robots on the line. Technol. Rev. (May-June).
• 12: BARN, J. 1978. Productivity assessment of office information systems technology. In Proceedings o{ the IEEE Symposium on Trends and Applications in Distributed Processing. IEEE, New York.
• 13: BARIFF, M., AND GALBRAITH, J. 1978. Intraorganizational power considerations for designing information systems. Account. Organ. Soc. 3, 1 (Mar.).
• 14: BARRON, I., AND CURNOW, R. 1979. The Future with Microelectronics. Francis Pinter, London.
• 15: BELL, D. 1980. The social framework of the information society. In The Computer Age: A Twenty- Year View, M. Dertouzos and J. Moses, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• 16: BERGER, P., AND LUCKMANN, T. 1966. The Social Construction o{ Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology o{ Knowledge. Doubleday, New York.
• 17: BJERKNES, G., AND BRATTETEIG, T. 1984. The application perspective--Another way of conceiving systems development and EDP-based systems. In Proceedings o{ the 7th Scandinavian Research Seminar on System Engineering (Helsinki, Finland, Aug.), M. Saaksjarvi, Ed.
• 18: BJERKNES, G., AND BRATTETEIG, T. 1985. FLOR- ENCE in Wonderland--Systems development with nurses. Paper presented at the Conference on Development and Use of Computer-Based Systems and Tools, Arhus, Denmark, Aug.
• 19: BJORN-ANDERSEN, N., AND EASON, K. 1980. Myths and realities of information systems contributing to organizational rationality. In Human Choice and Computers--2, A. Mowshowitz, Ed. North- Holland, Amsterdam.
• 20: BJORN-ANOERSEN, N., AND PEDERSEN, P. 1980. Computer facilitated changes in the management power structure. Account. Organ. Soc. 4, 2.
• 21: BLACKEY, B. 1980. Word processing, the job. In Office Automation-Analysis, Infotech State of the Art Report, London.
• 22: BOGUSLAW, R. 1965. The New Uptopians. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
• 23: Giampio Bracchi , Barbara Pernici, The design requirements of office systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.2 n.2, p.151-170, April 1984 [doi>10.1145/521.357416]
• 24: BRANDT, S. 1983. Working-at-home: How to cope with spatial design possibilities caused by the new communication media. Office Technol. People 2.
• 25: BRAVERMAN, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital--The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. Monthly Review Press, New York.
• 26: BRIEFS, U. 1980. The effects of computerization on human work--New directions for computer use in the work-place. In Human Choice and Computers--2, A. Mowshowitz, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
• 27: BUCHANAN, D., AND BODDY, D. 1983. Organizations in the Computer Age: Technological Imperaires and Strategic Choice. Gower, Aldershot, England.
• 28: BURKE, F., AND GEORGE, R. 1979. How top executives perceive their choices among information sources for decision. Paper presented at IFIP TC8.2 Conference, Bonn W. Germany, Sept.
• 29: BURNS, A. 1981. The Microchip: Appropriate or Inappropriate Technology? Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England.
• 30: BURNS, A., ED. 1984. New Information Technology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England.
• 31: BURNS, J. 1977. The evolution of office information systems. Datamation (Apr.).
• 32: BURRELL, G., AND MORGAN, G. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Heinemann, London.
• 33: BYLINSKY, G., AND MOORE, A. 1983. Flexible manufacturing systems. Fortune (Feb. 21).
• 34: CARLISLE, J. 1976. Evaluating the impact of office automation and top management communications. In National Computer Conference Proceedings.
• 35: V. E. Cheong , Rudy A. Hirschheim, Local Area Networks: Issues, Products and Developments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1983
• 36: CHILD, J. 1984. New technology and developments in management organization. Omega 12, 3.
• 37: CHRISTIE, B. 1981. Face to File Communication. Wiley, Chichester, England.
• 38: CLEGG, S., AND DUNKERLEY, D. 1980. Organization, Class and Control. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Henley, England.
• 39: COMPUTERTALK 1978. Certainly not at Pearl. Computertalk (Aug. 27).
• 40: COMPUTING 1980. Soul searching task of office automation. Computing (Feb. 14).
• 41: COMPUTING 1981. Automation: Office work has unpromising future. Computing (May 21).
• 42: CONRATH, D., AND DU ROURE, G. 1978. Organizational implications of comprehensive communication--Information systems: Some conjectures. Working paper, Institute d'Administration des Enterprises Centre d'l~,tude et de Recherche sur les Organizations et la Gestion, Aix-en-Provence, France.
• 43: CONRATH, D., HIGGINS, C., IRVING, R., AND THACK- ENKARY, C. 1981. Determining the need for ofrice automation: Methods and results. CECIT working paper, Department of Management Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
• 44: COOLEY, M. 1979. Computers, politics, unemployment. In Politics and Computing. Infotech State of the Art Report, London.
• 45: COOLEY, M. 1980. Architect or Bee? The Human/ Technology Relationship. Hand and Brain Publ., Slough, England.
• 46: CRAIG, M. 1981. Office Worker's Survival Handbook. British Society for Social Responsibility in Science, London.
• 47: CURLEY, K. 1984. Are there any real benefits from office automation? Bus. Horizons (July/ Aug.).
• 48: DAHL, R. 1957. The concept of power. Behav. Sci. (July).
• 49: DAHRENDORF, R. 1982. On Britain. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• 50: Michael L. Dertouzos , Joel Moses, Computer Age: A Twenty-Year View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980
• 51: Andrew Doswell, Office Automation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1983
• 52: DOWn,NO, H. 1980. Word processors and the oppression of women. In The Microelectronics Revolution, T. Forester, Ed. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
• 53: DYER, J., AND HOFFENBERG, M. 1975. Evaluating the quality of working life--Some reflections on production and cost and a method for problem definition. In The Quality of Working Life, vol. 1, L. Davis and A. Cherns, Eds. Free Press, New York.
• 54: EDP ANALYZER 1978. The automated office: Part 1. EDP Anal 16, 9.
• 55: EDWARDS, G. 1977. An analysis of usage and related perceptions of NLS--A computer based text processing and communications system. Bell Canada Rep., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Oct.
• 56: EDWARDS, G. 1978. Organizational impacts of office automation. Telecommun. Policy (June).
• 57: Clarence A. Ellis , Gary J. Nutt, Office Information Systems and Computer Science, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.12 n.1, p.27-60, March 1980 [doi>10.1145/356802.356805]
• 58: EHN, P., AND KYNG, M. 1985. STARDUST MEM- ORIES: Scandinavian tradition and research on development and use of systems and tools. Paper presented at the Conference on Development and Use of Computer-Based Systems and Tools (Arbus, Denmark, Aug.).
• 59: EHN, P., AND SANDBERG, A. 1983. Local union influence on technology and work organization: Some results from the DEMOS Project. In Systems Design for, with and by the Users, U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North- Holland, Amsterdam.
• 60: EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION (EOC) 1980. Technology in the office: The impact on women's jobs. Equal Opportunities Commission Rep., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Sept.
• 61: ETZlONI, A. 1967. The Active Society. Free Press, New York.
• 62: EVANS, C. 1979. The Mighty Micro. Victor Gollancz, London.
• 63: FAY, B. 1975. Social Theory and Political Practice. Allen & Unwin, London.
• 64: Edward Feigenbaum , Pamela McCorduck, The fifth generation: artificial intelligence and Japan's computer challenge to the world, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1983
• 65: FEYERABEND, P. 1978. Science in a Free Society. Doubleday, New York.
• 66: Tom Forester, Microelectronics Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981
• 67: Tom Forester, The information technology revolution, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1985
• 68: FRENCH, J., AND RAVEN, B. 1959. The bases of social power, in Studies in Social Power, D. Cartwight, Ed. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich.
• 69: Jay R. Galbraith, Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1973
• 70: GLASS. R, B., A~O STRAUSS, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago.
• 71: GLENN, E., A~D FELBER6, R. 1979. Technology and the transformation of clerical work. Working paper quoted in Gregory, J., and Nussbaum, K. 1982. Office Technol. People I (Nov.).
• 72: GOLDFIELD, R. 1978. The new word processing manager. Datamation (Sept.).
• 73: GREGORY, J., AND NUSSBAUM, K. 1982. Race against time: Automation and the office. Office Technol. People I (Nov.).
• 74: HABERMAS, J. 1973. Legitimation Crisis. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt.
• 75: HABERMAS, J. 1974. Theory and Practice. Heinemann, London.
• 76: HABERMAS, J. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Heinemann, London.
• 77: HMOER, P. 1979. Planning for office automation. In Proceedings of the Infotech State of the Art Conference on Convergence (Vienna, Austria, Apr.). Infotech, London.
• 78: HALFPENNY, P. 1979. The analysis of qualitative data. Sociol. Rev. 27, 4.
• 79: HAMMER, M., AND SmBU, M. 1980. What is office automation? In Proceedings of the 1980 Office Automation Conference (Atlanta, Ga., Mar.).
• 80: HAYES, J., ANO MICmE, D., Eds. 1983. intelligent Systems: The Unprecedented Opportunity. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England.
• 81: HILTZ, S. R., ANO TUROFF, M. 1978. The Network Nation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
• 82: Starr Roxanne Hiltz , Murray Turoff, The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system, Communications of the ACM, v.24 n.11, p.739-751, Nov. 1981 [doi>10.1145/358790.358794]
• 83: R. A. Hirschheim, Office automation: a social and organizational perspective, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1986
• 84: HIRSCHHEIM, R. 1985b. Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. In Research Methods in Information Systems, E. Mumford, R. Hir~chheim, G. Fitzgerald, and T. Wood- Harpe~ Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
• 85: HOOS, I. 1960. When the computer takes over the office. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July-Aug.).
• 86: HORKHmMER, M. 1947. The Eclipse of Reason. Seabury Press, New York.
• 87: HOWARD, R. 1985. UTOPIA: Where workers craft new technology. Technol. Rev. 88, 3 (Apr.).
• 88: HUNT, J., AND NEWELL, P. 1971. Management in the 1980s revisited. Personnel J. 50, 1 (Jan.).
• 89: IVES, B., AND OLSON, M. 1981. Manager or technician? The nature of the information systems manager's job. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 5, 4 (Dec.).
• 90: JENKINS, C., AND SHERMAN, B. 1979. The Collapse of Work. Eyre Methuen, London.
• 91: JONASSON, S. 1980. Computerization and human and social requirements, in Human Choice and Computers--2, A. Mowshowitz, Ed. North- Holland, Amsterdam.
• 92: Barry O. Jones, Sleepers, Wake!: Technology and the Future of Work, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1983
• 93: KANT, I. 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Harper Torchbooks, New York.
• 94: KEEN, P., AND Scour MORTON, M. 1978. Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
• 95: KELLY, J. 1979. The use and usefulness of word processing. In Proceedings of the Infotech State of the Art Conference (London). Infotech, London.
• 96: KLATZSKY, S. 1970. Automation, size and the lows of decision making: The cascading effect. J. Bus. 43.
• 97: KLEIN, H. 1981. Design ideals and their critical reconstruction. Paper presented at the TIMS/ ORSA meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May.
• 98: KLEIN, H., AND HIRSCHHEIM, R. 1983. Issues and approaches to appraising technological change in the office: A consequentialist perspective. Office: Tech. People 2.
• 99: KLEIN, H., AND LYYTINEN, K. 1985. The poverty of scientism in information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems, E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and T. Wood- Harper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
• 100: Rob Kling, Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.12 n.1, p.61-110, March 1980 [doi>10.1145/356802.356806]
• 101: KLING, R. 1984. Assimilating social values in computer-based technologies. Telecommun. Policy, June.
• 102: KLING, R., AND SCACCm, W. 1982. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. In Advances in Computers, vol. 21. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
• 103: Philip Kraft, Programmers and Managers: The Routinization of Computer Programming in the United States, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1984
• 104: KUHN, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
• 105: LAND, F., AND HIRSCHHEIM, R. 1983. Participative systems design: Rationale, tools and techniques. Jr. Appl. Syst. Anal. 10.
• 106: LAND, F., AND KENNEDY-MCGREGOR, M. 1981. Effective use of internal information. In Proceedings of FEWIST--First European Workshop on Information Systems Teaching (Aix-en-Provence, France, Apr.).
• 107: LEAVITT, H. 1964. Applied organization change in industry: Structural, technical and human approaches. In Management and Motivation, V. Vroom and E. Deci, Eds. Penguin Books, Harmonsworth, England.
• 108: LEAVITT, H., AND WHISLER, T. 1958. Management in the 1980s. Harvard Bus. Rev. (Nov.-Dec.), 41-48.
• 109: LEDUC, N. 1979. Communicating through computers: Impact on a small business group. Telecommun. Policy (Sept.).
• 110: LYYTINEN, K., AND KLEIN, H. 1985. Critical social theory as a basis for the theory of information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems, E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, and T. Wood-Harper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
• 111: MALDES, J. 1980. Human aspects of office automation. In Office Automation, Infotech State of the Art Rep., London.
• 112: MARKOFF, J., AND STEWART, j. 1979. The microprocessor revolution: An office on the head of a pin. These Times (March 3-17).
• 113: MARKUS, M. L. 1981. Implementation politics--Top management support and user involvement. Syst. Objectives Solutions 1, 4.
• 114: M. Lynne Markus, Power, politics, and MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.6, p.430-444, June 1983 [doi>10.1145/358141.358148]
• 115: MARTIN, J. 1981. The Telematic Society. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
• 116: MATTEIS, R. 1979. The new back office focuses on customer service. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March- Apr.).
• 117: MCCARTHY, T. 1982. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• 118: MCMAHON, F. 1980. Office drudges and the bosses who can't spell. Computing (Mar. 8).
• 119: MINTZBERG, H. 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. Harper & Row, New York.
• 120: MINTZBERG, H. 1983. Power in and Around Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
• 121: MITROFF, I. 1983. Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• 122: MOWSHOWITZ, A. 1976. The Conquest of Will: Information Processing in Human Affairs. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass.
• 123: A. Mowshowitz, Computers and the Mechanication of Judgement, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1977
• 124: MOWSHOWlTZ, A. 1980. Ethics and cultural integration in a computerized world. In Human Choice and Computers--2, A. Mowshowitz, Ed. North- Holland, Amsterdam.
• 125: MSC. 1982. Text processing--The implications of the new technology. Manpower Services Commission Rep., London, Mar.
• 126: MUMFORO, L. 1970. The Myth of the Machine: The Pentagon of Power. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
• 127: NOLAN, R. 1973. Computer data bases: The future is now. Harvard Bus. Rev. (Sept.-Oct.).
• 128: Simon Nora , Alain Minc, Computerization of Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980
• 129: OECD 1966. Manpower aspects of automation and technical change. OECD Final Rep., Paris.
• 130: OLSON, M. 1981. Remote office work: Implications for individuals and organization. Working Paper CRIS #25, GBA 81-56(CR), Graduate School of Business, New York Univ., New York.
• 131: Margrethe H. Olson , Henry C. Lucas, Jr., The impact of office automation on the organization: some implications for research and practice, Communications of the ACM, v.25 n.11, p.838-847, Nov 1982 [doi>10.1145/358690.358720]
• 132: O'NEAL, J. 1976. We increased typing productivity by 340%. The Office (Feb.).
• 133: PEPPER, S. 1942. World Hypotheses. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.
• 134: PETTmREW, A. 1973. The Politics of Organizational Decision Making. Tavistock, London.
• 135: POrPEL, H. 1982. Who needs the office of the future? Harvard Bus. Rev. (Nov.-Dec.).
• 136: PRICE, $. 1979. Introducing the Electronic Office. NCC Publ., Manchester, England.
• 137: PSI 1983. The electronic office: Progress and problems. Policy Studies Institute Res. Paper 83-1, London, Apr.
• 138: RANK XEROX 1983. Networking--The distributed office: A new venture in modes of employment. Rank Xerox Document, London.
• 139: RAWLS, J. 1973. A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
• 140: RHEE, H. 1968. Office Automation in Social Perspective: The Progress and Social Implications of Electronic Data Processing. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
• 141: ROBINSON, A. 1980. Electronics and employment: Displacement effects. In The Microelectronics Revolution, T. Forester, Ed. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
• 142: ROSENBROCK, H. 1977. The future of control. A utornatica 13.
• 143: RULE, J., MCADAM, D., STEARNS, L., ANO UGLOW, D. 1980a. The Politics of Privacy. New America Library, New York.
• 144: RULE, J., MCAOAM, D., STEARNS, L., AND UGLOW, D. 1980b. Preserving individual autonomy in an information-oriented society, in Computers and Privacy in the Next Decade, L. Hoffman, Ed. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
• 145: SADLER, P. 1980. Welcome back to the 'automation' debate. In The Microelectronics Revolution, T. Forester, Ed. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
• 146: SCOTT, G. 1976. A data base for your company. Calif. Manage. Rev. 19, 1 (Fall).
• 147: SHERMAN, B. 1980. Word processors are human too. In Office Automation, infotech State of the Art Rep., London.
• 148: SIEMENS 1978. Report on employment. Reported in Computing (Mar. 6, 1980).
• 149: Herbert Alexander Simon, The New Science of Management Decision, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1977
• 150: SIMON, H. 1980. What computers mean for man and society. In The Microelectronics Revolution, T. Forester, Ed. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
• 151: SIMOr~S, G. 1981. Introducing Word Processing. NCC Publ., Manchester, England.
• 152: SLEIGH, J., BOATWRIGHT, B., IRWIN, P., AND STAN- YON, R. 1979. The manpower implications of microelectronic technology. Rep. for Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
• 153: SPRAGUE, R. 1980. A framework for research on decision support systems. In Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, G. Fick and R. Sprague, Eds. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.
• 154: STEWART, R. 1971a. How Computers Affect Management. Macmillan, London.
• 155: STEWART, R. 1971b. Do you know what you want? Data Process. (May-June).
• 156: STOrmIER, T. 1980. The impact of microprocessors on employment. In The Microelectronics Revolution, T. Forester, Ed. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
• 157: STRASSMANN, P. 1982. Information technology and organizations. Paper presented at the IT'82 Conference, London, Dec.
• 158: STRASSMANN, P. 1984. Information Payoff. Macmillan, London.
• 159: SUTTON, M., AND KAYE, A. 1983. Factors related to productivity for professionals and managers. Working Paper SCE-83-13, Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Nov.
• 160: TAPSCOTT, D. 1982. Office Automation: A User- Driven Approach. Plenum Press, New York.
• 161: TOFFLER, A. 1980. The Third Wave. William Collins, London.
• 162: TOONG, H., AND GUPTA, A. 1982. Personal computers. Sci. Am. (Dec.)
• 163: Eileen M. Trauth , Stephen K Kwan , Susanna Barber, Channel selection and effective communication for managerial decision making, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.2 n.2, p.123-140, April 1984 [doi>10.1145/521.522]
• 164: U. S. COMPTROLLER GENERAL 1984. Strong central management of office automation will boost productivity. Syst. Objectives Solutions 4.
• 165: UHLIG, R., FARBER, D., ANO BAIR, J. 1979. The Office of the Future. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
• 166: VAN MAANEN, J., Ed. 1979. Special edition on "qualitative methodology." Admin. Sci. Q. 24, 4 (Dec.).
• 167: ViRGO, P. 1979. Report on employment. Reported in Computing (Mar. 6, 1980).
• 168: VYSSOTSKY, V. 1980. The use of computers for busihess functions. In The Computer Age: A Twenty- Year View, M. Dertouzos and J. Moses, Eds. MiT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• 169: WAINRIGHT, J., AND FRANCIS, A. 1984. Office Automarion, Organization and the Nature of Work. Gower, Aldershot, England.
• 170: WALTON, R. 1975. Criteria for quality of working life. In The Quality of Working Life, vol. 1, L. Davis and A. Cherns, Eds. Free Press, New York.
• 171: WALTON, R., ^No VITTOm, W. 1983. New information technology: Organizational problem or opportunity? Office Technol. People 1.
• 172: WARE, W. 1980. Privacy and information technology--The years ahead. In Computers and Privacy in the Next Decade, L. Hoffman, Ed. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
• 173: WARNER, M. 1984. New technology, work organizations and industrial relations. Omega 12, 3.
• 174: WARNER, M., AND STONE, M. 1970. The Data Bank Society: Organizations, Computers and Social Freedom. Allen & Unwin, London.
• 175: Joseph Weizenbaum, Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY, 1976
• 176: WEIZENBAUM, J. 1980. Once more: The computer revolution. In The Computer Age: A Twenty- Year View, M. Dertouzos and J. Moses, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• 177: WHISLER, T. 1970. Information Technology and Organizational Change. Wadsworth Publ., Belmont, Calif.
• 178: WHITE, R. 1977. A prototype for the automated office. Datarnation (Apr.).
• 179: WYNNE, B., AND OTWA~, H. 1983. Information technology, power and managers. Office Technol. People 2.
• 180: ZISMA~, M. 1978. Office automation: Revolution or evolution. Sloan Manage. Rev. (Spring).
• 181: ZU~OFF, S. 1981. Psychological and organizational implications of computer-mediated work. CISR Rep. #71, Center for Information Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., June.

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY

General Terms:
Economics, Human Factors, Management, Performance, Theory