| A method for enumerating cosets of a group presented by a canonical system |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.15 MB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation
archive
Proceedings of the ACM-SIGSAM 1989 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
table of contents
Portland, Oregon, United States
Pages: 338 - 350
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-325-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
N. Kuhn
|
Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 6750 Kaiserslautern (FRG)
|
|
K. Madlener
|
Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 6750 Kaiserslautern (FRG)
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 13, Citation Count: 8
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The application of rewriting techniques to enumerate cosets of subgroups in groups is investigated. Given a class of groups G having canonical string rewriting presentations we consider the GWP for this class which is defined by GWP(w,U) iff w ∈ <U> for w ∈ G, finite U⊆G, G ∈ G where <U> is the subgroup of G generated by U. We show how to associate to U two rewriting relations @@@@U and @@@@U on strings such that w ∈ <U> iff w @@@@U &lgr; iff w @@@@U &lgr; (&lgr; the empty word), both representing the left congruence generated by <U>. We derive general critical pair criteria for confluence and &lgr;-confluence for these relations. Using these criteria completion procedures can be constructed which enumerate cosets like the Todd-Coxeter algorithm without explicit definition of all cosets. The procedures are shown to be terminating if the index of the subgroup is finite or for groups with finite canonical monadic group presentations. If the completion procedure terminates it returns a prefix rewriting system which is confluent on &Sgr;*, thus deciding the GWP and the index problem for this class of groups. The normal forms of the rewriting relations form a minimal Schreier-representative system of <U> in G.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Atkinson, M. (ed.): Computational Group Theory. Academic Press London (1984).
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Avenhaus, J., Madlener, K., Otto, F.: Groups presented by finite two-monadic Church-Rosser Thue Systems. Trans. of the American Math. Soc., 297 (1986), 427-443.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Bauer, G.' Zur Darstellung yon Monoiden durch konfiuente Regelsysteme. Dissertation Universit~t Kaiserslautern (1981 ).
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Book, R., Jantzen, M., Wrathall, C.: Monadic Thue Systems. Theoretical Comp. Science 19 (1982), 231-251.
|
| |
8
|
Dehn, M.' Uber unendliche diskontinuierliche Gruppen. Math. Ann., 71 (1911), 116-144.
|
| |
9
|
Gilman, R.' Presentations of Groups and Monoids. J. Alg. 57 (1979), 544-554.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Lyndon, R.C., Schupp, P.E.: Combinatorial group theory. Springer- Verlag, Berlin (1977).
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Miller, C.F. Iii: On group-theoretic decision problems and their classifications. Ann. of Math. Studies 68, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
|
| |
14
|
Nielsen, J.:Om Regning med ikke kommutative Faktoren og dens Anvendelse i Gruppeteorien. Matematisk Tidsskrift B, (1921), 77-94.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Wigmann, D.: Anwendungen yon Rewriting- Techniken in polyzyklischen Gruppen.. Dissertation, Universit~it Kaiserslautern (1989).
|
CITED BY 8
|
|
|
|
|
Norbert Kuhn , Klaus Madlener , Friedrich Otto, Computing presentations for subgroups of context-free groups, Papers from the international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation, p.240-250, July 27-29, 1992, Berkeley, California, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|