ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A method for enumerating cosets of a group presented by a canonical system
Full text PdfPdf (1.15 MB)
Source International Conference on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation archive
Proceedings of the ACM-SIGSAM 1989 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation table of contents
Portland, Oregon, United States
Pages: 338 - 350  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-325-6
Authors
N. Kuhn  Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 6750 Kaiserslautern (FRG)
K. Madlener  Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 6750 Kaiserslautern (FRG)
Sponsor
SIGSAM: ACM Special Interest Group on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74540.74580
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The application of rewriting techniques to enumerate cosets of subgroups in groups is investigated. Given a class of groups G having canonical string rewriting presentations we consider the GWP for this class which is defined by GWP(w,U) iff w ∈ <U> for w ∈ G, finite U⊆G, G ∈ G where <U> is the subgroup of G generated by U. We show how to associate to U two rewriting relations @@@@U and @@@@U on strings such that w ∈ <U> iff w @@@@U &lgr; iff w @@@@U &lgr; (&lgr; the empty word), both representing the left congruence generated by <U>. We derive general critical pair criteria for confluence and &lgr;-confluence for these relations. Using these criteria completion procedures can be constructed which enumerate cosets like the Todd-Coxeter algorithm without explicit definition of all cosets. The procedures are shown to be terminating if the index of the subgroup is finite or for groups with finite canonical monadic group presentations. If the completion procedure terminates it returns a prefix rewriting system which is confluent on &Sgr;*, thus deciding the GWP and the index problem for this class of groups. The normal forms of the rewriting relations form a minimal Schreier-representative system of <U> in G.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Atkinson, M. (ed.): Computational Group Theory. Academic Press London (1984).
 
2
 
3
Avenhaus, J., Madlener, K., Otto, F.: Groups presented by finite two-monadic Church-Rosser Thue Systems. Trans. of the American Math. Soc., 297 (1986), 427-443.
4
 
5
Bauer, G.' Zur Darstellung yon Monoiden durch konfiuente Regelsysteme. Dissertation Universit~t Kaiserslautern (1981 ).
 
6
 
7
Book, R., Jantzen, M., Wrathall, C.: Monadic Thue Systems. Theoretical Comp. Science 19 (1982), 231-251.
 
8
Dehn, M.' Uber unendliche diskontinuierliche Gruppen. Math. Ann., 71 (1911), 116-144.
 
9
Gilman, R.' Presentations of Groups and Monoids. J. Alg. 57 (1979), 544-554.
 
10
 
11
Lyndon, R.C., Schupp, P.E.: Combinatorial group theory. Springer- Verlag, Berlin (1977).
 
12
 
13
Miller, C.F. Iii: On group-theoretic decision problems and their classifications. Ann. of Math. Studies 68, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 
14
Nielsen, J.:Om Regning med ikke kommutative Faktoren og dens Anvendelse i Gruppeteorien. Matematisk Tidsskrift B, (1921), 77-94.
 
15
 
16
Wigmann, D.: Anwendungen yon Rewriting- Techniken in polyzyklischen Gruppen.. Dissertation, Universit~it Kaiserslautern (1989).

CITED BY  8