ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
LASSIE: structure to layout for behavioral synthesis tools
Full text PdfPdf (804 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 26th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference table of contents
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Pages: 104 - 109  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-310-8
Authors
M. T. Trick  Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
S. W. Director  Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEEE-CS\TCDA : TC Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 7,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74382.74401
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Behavioral synthesis tools generate a wide range of designs, not all suited to one layout style. Thus there is a need for a flexible framework for mapping behavioral synthesis output onto module generators and layout tools. LASSIE provides this flexible framework and introduces a structural binding step that adapts the output of behavioral synthesis tools to different layout styles. The design process is divided into structural binding, partitioning, placement, and layout generation. Several options are provided at each step, and feedback is provided to the user to allow him to evaluate the results of each step.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
R. Jarmer, N. Bek.kara, and A. Jerraya. The Automatic Synthesis of Data Processing Sections. In inf. Con}. on Cornpurer Design, pages 64-66. IEEE, I986.
 
5
 
6
Howard Trickey, Flamet: A High Level Hardware Compiler. IEEE T~,ansactions on CAD, CAD-6(2):259-269, March 1987.
7
8
9
 
10
David Hsu, Leslie Grate, Charles Ng, Mark Hartoog, and Denis Bohm. The Ch~pCompiler, An Automated Standard Cell/Macrocell Physical Design Tool. In Custom Integeated Circuits Conference, pages 488-491. IEEE, July 1987.
 
11
H.G. Thonemann, M. Kolonko, and H. Severloh. VENUS - An Advanced VLSI Design Environment for Custom Integrated Circuits with Macro Cells, Standard Cells and Gate Arrays. In 1987 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pages 492-497. IEEE, July 1987.
 
12
Eel D. Un. Evaluating Register-Transfer Level Synthesis Tools Using Gate Level Simulation. Master's thesis, ECE Dept. Carnegie Mellon University, Jan 1989.
 
13
 
14
Michael R. Garey and David S. Johnson. Computers and Inteactability. Freeman, 1979.
 
15
Tetsuo Asano. An Optimum Gate Placement Algorithm for MOS One-Dimensional Arrays. Journal of Digital Systems, VI(1):1-27, Jan. 1982.
 
16
Carl Sechen and Kai-Win Lee. An Improved Simulated Annealing AIgorithm for Row-Based Placement. In Int. Conf. on ComputeT'-Aided Design, pages 478-481, Santa Clara, CA, 11 1987. ACM/IEEE.
 
17
 
18
Wendy Wu. DIF: Design Interchange Forma$. ECE Dept. CMU, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, preliminary edition, 1987.
 
19
Robert K. Brayton, A. Richard Newton, and Alberto Sangiovarmi-Vincentelli. Oct Tools Distribution 2.1. Tech. report, Elec. Res. Lab, UC, Berkeley, March 1988.
 
20
Thomas F. Cobourn. The Mz User Manual. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1 edition, 1988.


Collaborative Colleagues:
M. T. Trick: colleagues
S. W. Director: colleagues