ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Asynchronous design/evaluation methods for hypertext technology development
Full text PdfPdf (1.98 MB)
Source Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive
Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Hypertext table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 61 - 81  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-339-6
Author
G. Perlman  Department of Computer and Information Science, The Ohio State University, 2036 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH
Sponsors
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74224.74230
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A process model used in the design and evaluation of hypertext systems is discussed. The model includes asynchronous processes of task analysis, document analysis, literature survey and systems evaluation, interpretation of data, designing and building systems, and collecting data. For each process, experiences with NaviText™ SAM, a hypertext interface to a reference source, are discussed. A variety of new methods for evaluation of experimental systems are presented along with several empirical results.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

Aksc88
Brow87
Camp89
 
Conk87
 
Coom70
Coombs, C., Dawes, R., & Tversky, A. (1970) Mathematical Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
 
DoD89
DoD (1989) MIL-STD-1472D: Human Engineering Design Criteria for Military Systems, Equipment and Facilities. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
Egan89
Furn86
Glus88
Glus89
Hala88
 
IDE86
IDE (1986) Software Through Pictures" Data Flow Editor (DFE) Manual. San Francisco: interactive Development Environments.
 
Marc88
 
Mant82
Mantei, M. M. (1982) A Study of Disorientation Behavior in ZOG. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
 
Mill56
Miller, O. (1956) "'The Magical Number Sever Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information." Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
 
Mosi86
Mosier, J. N. & Smith, S. L. (1986) "Application of Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software." Bchaviour and Information Technology, 5, 39-46.
 
Perl87
Perlman, G. (1987) An Overview of SAM: A Hypertext Interface to Smith & Mosier's 'Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software.' Wang Institute Tech. Report WI-TR-87-09.
 
Perl88
Perlman, G. & Moorhead, A. J. (1988) "Applying Hypertext Methods for the Effective Utilization of Standards." ProceeAings of the IEEE COMPSTAN'88 Conference on Computer Standards.
 
Perl89a
 
Perl89b
Perlman, G. (1989b) "The Checklist Method for Applying Guidelines to Design and Evaluation." Pr~ings of INTERFACE 89. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Remd87
 
Salt83
Samu89
 
Scha89
Schank, C. & Mamrak, S. A. (1989) "A Composition Environment to Support Scholarly Writing." Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Computer and Information Science. Technical report OSU-CISRC-6/89-TR27.
 
Smit84
Smith, S. L & Mosier, J. N. (1984) "A Design Evaluation Checklist Report MTR-9480. Bedford, for User-System interface Software." MA: MITRE Corporation.
 
Smit86
Smith, S. L & Mosier, J. N. (1986) "Guidelines for Designing User interface Software." Bedford, MA: MITRE Corporation.
 
Walk88

CITED BY  9