The design of an attorney's statistical consultant

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

The design of an attorney's statistical consultant

Full text

Pdf (1.05 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Pages: 224 - 233

Year of Publication: 1989

ISBN:0-89791-322-1

Author

L. S. Lutomski

Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence, Litigation Support Program, The American Institutes for Research

Sponsor

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 7, Citation Count: 7

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74014.74043 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	Aqvist65	Aqvist, Lennart. 1965. A New Approach to the Logic of lnterro gatives. Part I: Analysis. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
	Ashley88	Kevin D. Ashley , Edwina L. Rissland, A Case-Based Approach to Modeling Legal Expertise, IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, v.3 n.3, p.70-77, September 1988 [doi>10.1109/64.21892]
	Baldus80	Baldus, David C., & Cole, James W. L. 1980. Statistical Proof of Discrimination. New York: McGraw- Hill.
	Barnes86	Barnes, David W., & Conley, John M. 1986. Statistical Evidence in Litigation. Boston: Little, Brown.
	Bench-Capon85	Bench-Capon, Trevor, & Sergot, Marek. 1985. Toward a Rule-Based Representation of Open-Texture in Law. Technical Report, Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.
	Chandrasekaran83	Chandrasekaran, B. 1983. Toward a Taxonomy of Problem-Solving Types. A/Magazine, 4, 9-17.
	Charniak82	Chamiak, E. 1982. Context Recognition in Language Comprehension. In Lehnert, W. & Ringle, M., eds., Strategies for Natural Language Processing. Erlbaum: Hillsdale.
	Charniak85	Eugene Charniak , Drew McDermott, Introduction to artificial intelligence, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1985
	Charniak88	E. Charniak, Motivation analysis, abductive unification, and nonmonotonic equality, Artificial Intelligence, v.34 n.3, p.275-295, April 1988 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(88)90063-X]
	Collingwood62	Collingwood, R. G. 1962. An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
	Curtis83	Curtis, Wayne C. 1983. Statistical Concepts for Attorneys: A Reference Guide. Westport: Quorum.
	Freedman78	Freedman, D., et al. 1978. Statistics. New York: W. W. Norton.
	Gale86	A William Gale, Artificial intelligence and statistics, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1986
	Gardner87	Anne von der Lieth Gardner, An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
	Hanson58	Hanson, N. R. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Harrah61	Han, ah, D. 1961. A Logic of Questions and Answers. Philosophy of Science, 28, 40-46.
	Hart61	Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
	Holland87	John H. Holland , Keith J. Holyoak , Richard E. Nisbett , Paul R. Thagard, Induction: processes of inference, learning, and discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986
	Josephson87	Josephson, J., et al. 1987. A Mechanism for Forming Composite Explanatory I-Iypo~e~s. Technical Report 87-JJ-EXHYPO, Computer and Information Science Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus.
	Kuhn62	Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
	Lakatos70	Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A., eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
	Lauritzen88	Lauritzen, S. & Spiegelhalter, D. 1988. Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and Their Application to Expert Systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 50, 2, 157-224.
	McCarthy69	McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Intelligence, 4, 463-502.
	Miller86	Perry L. Miller, Expert Critiquing Systems, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1986
	Pople77	Pople, H. 1977. The Formation of Composite Hypotheses in Diagnostic Problem Solving. IJCAI.5, 1030- 1037.
	Punch86	Punch, W., et al. 1986. Design Considerations for Pierce, a High Level Language for Hypothesis Assembly. Technical Report 86-WP-PIERCE, Computer and Information Science Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus.
	Reggia83	Reggia, J., et al. 1983. Diagnostic Expert Systems Based on a Set Covering Model. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 19,437-460.
	Rissland88	Edwina Rissland, AI and legal reasoning, AI Magazine, v.9 n.3, p.45-55, September 1988
	Rorty79	Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the M i rfor of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
	Rynin64	Rynin, David. 1964. Donagan on Collingwood: Absolute Presuppositions, Truth, and Metaphysics. Review of Metaphysics, 18, 301-333.
	Sergot86	M. J. Sergot , F. Sadri , R. A. Kowalski , F. Kriwaczek , P. Hammond , H. T. Cory, The British Nationality Act as a logic program, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.5, p.370-386, May 1986 [doi>10.1145/5689.5920]
	Shortliffe76	Shordiffe, E. H. 1976. Computer-BasedMedical Consultation: MYCIN. New York: Elsevier.
	Strawson85	Strawson, P. F. 1985. Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. New York: Columbia University.
	Thagard88	Paul Thagard, Computational philosophy of science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988
	Toulmin,58	Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Winograd80	Winograd, T. 1980. Extended Inference Modes in Reasoning by Computer Systems. Artificial InteUigence, 13, 5-26.

CITED BY 7

	Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton, Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom
	Floris Bex , Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton, Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.11 n.2-3, p.125-165, January 2003
	Katie Atkinson , Trevor Bench-Capon , Peter McBurney, Arguing about cases as practical reasoning, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 06-11, 2005, Bologna, Italy
	Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon , Paul E. Dunne, Argumentation in AI and law: editors' introduction, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.13 n.1, p.1-8, January 2005
	Katie Atkinson , Trevor Bench-Capon, Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.13 n.1, p.93-131, January 2005
	T. J. M. Bench-Capon , Paul E. Dunne, Argumentation in artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, v.171 n.10-15, p.619-641, July, 2007
	Charles Unwin, An object model for use in oral and written advocacy, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.16 n.4, p.389-402, December 2008

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
E. Data

Additional Classification:
G. Mathematics of Computing

I. Computing Methodologies
I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
I.2.1 Applications and Expert Systems
Subjects: Law

J. Computer Applications
J.2 PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
Subjects: Mathematics and statistics

General Terms:
Algorithms, Design, Legal Aspects

Adobe Acrobat

QuickTime

Windows Media Player

Real Player