CACE: computer-assisted case evaluation in the Brooklyn District Attorney's Office

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

CACE: computer-assisted case evaluation in the Brooklyn District Attorney's Office

Full text

Pdf (492 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Pages: 215 - 223

Year of Publication: 1989

ISBN:0-89791-322-1

Author

S. S. Weiner

Harvard Law School

Sponsor

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 16, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74014.74042 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Tumin (for The Project on Criminal Justice, Kennedy School of Government), Computer-Assisted Case Evaluation, a proposal to the Smith Richardson Foundation, Dec. 1987.
	2	Harvard Business School, The Brooklyn DA's Office: Client Contact Systems. Case 9-188-105, Dec. 1988.
	3	R. E. Susskind, Expert systems in law: out of the research laboratory and into the marketplace, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.1-8, May 27-29, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/41735.41736]
	4	Gardner, A., "Overview of an AI Approach to Legal Reasoning". from Computing Power and Legal Reasoning, edited by C. Waters, West Publishing Co., 1985.
	5	New York Penal Law, Article 20.
	6	New York Penal Law, Section 220.16(1).
	7	Kolodner, J., "Maintaining Organization in a Dynamic Long-Term Memory", from Cognitive Science, vol. 7, 1983.
	8	Mitchell, T., "Learning and Problem Solving". from Proceedings of the Eigth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1983.
	9	Rissland and Ashley, "Hypo~eticals as Heuristic Device". Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 1986.
	10	McCarty, "Example Generation". Third Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of lntelligence, 1980.
	11	Philip Klahr , Donald A. Waterman, Expert systems techniques, tools and applications, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1986
	12	New York Penal Law, Article 115.
	13	Davis, "Expert Systems: Where Are We? And Where Do We Go from Here?", Ai Memo 665, MiT AI Lab, 1982.
	14	S. S. Weiner, Reasoning about 'hard' cases in Talmudic law, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.222-230, May 27-29, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/41735.41760]
	15	Miller, "Using Practice Support Systems". Legal Economics, May/June, 1988.