|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
L.E. Allen. Symbolic logic: A razor-edged tool ~r drafting and interpreting legal documents. Yale Law Journal, 66:833-879, 1957.
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
J. Barwise and ~I. Petty. Situations and Attitudes. Bradford Books, MIT Press, 1983.
|
| |
6
|
A.J. Bonnet. A PROLOG framework for reasoning about permissions and obligations, with appliestions to contract law. Unpublished seminar paper, Rutgers University, 1985.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
A.J. Bonnet. A logic for hypothetical reasoning. In Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on A rtificial Intelligence, pages 480--484. AAAI, 1988.
|
| |
9
|
H.C. Bunt. Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semaniics. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
|
| |
10
|
K.L. Clark. Negation as failure. In H. Gallaire and J. Minker, editors, Logic and Data Bases, pages 293--322. Plenum, 1978.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
;I. Doyle. A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence, 12:231-272, 1979.
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
T.F. Gordon. The importance of nonmonotonicity for legal reasoning. In H. Fiedler, F. Haft, and R. Ttaunmflller, editors, Ezpert Systems in Lavo: Impacts on Legal Theorlt and Computer Law, pages 111-126. Attempto-Verlag, Tiibingen, 1988.
|
| |
15
|
P. Hayes. The frame problem and related problems in artificial intelligence, in A. Elithorn and D. Jones, editors, Artificial and Human Thinking, pages 45-59. Jossey-Bass, 1973.
|
| |
16
|
R. Jackendoff. Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press, 1983.
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
J. McCarthy. First order theories of individual concepts and propositions. In J. Hayes, D. Michie, and L. Mikulich, editors, Machine Intelligence, volume 9, pages 129-147. Ellis Horwood, 1979.
|
| |
20
|
J. McCarthy. Circumscription: A form of nonmonotonic reasoning. A rtificial Intelligence, 13: 27- 39, 1980.
|
| |
21
|
L.T. McCarty. Reflections on TAXMAN: An experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harvard Law Review, 90:837-93, 1977.
|
| |
22
|
L.T. McCarty. Intelligent legal information systerns: Problems and prospects. Rutgers Compurer and Technology Law Journa~ 9(2):265-294, 1983. Also published in C. Campbell, editor, Data Processing and the ~aw, pp. 125-151 (Sweet and Maxwell, 1984).
|
| |
23
|
L.T. McCarty. Permissions and obligations. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 287-294, 1983.
|
| |
24
|
L.T. McCarty. Permissions and obligations: An informal introduction. In A.A. Martino and F. Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of ~egal Tezts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 307-337. Elsevier North-Holland, 1986. Also available as ttutgers Technical Report LRP-TR-19.
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
L.T. McCaxty. Intelligent legal information systems' An update. In H. Fiedler, F. Haft, and R. Traunmiiller, editors, Ezpert Systems in ~aw: Impacts on Legal Theory and Computer Law, pages 15-25. Attempto-Verlag, Tflbingen, 1988. Also published in Law and Computers, No. 5, pp. 196- 202 (Law and Computers Association of J~pan, July 1987).
|
| |
28
|
L.T. McCarty. Programming directly in a nonmonotonic logic. Technical Report LRP-TR-21, Computer Science Department, Rutgers U niversity, September 1988.
|
| |
29
|
L.T. McCarty. Computing with prototypes (preliminary report). Technical Report LRP-TR-22, Computer Science Department, Rutgers University, March 1989.
|
| |
30
|
L.T. McCarty. Real relationships. Forthcoming, 1989.
|
| |
31
|
L.T. McCatty and N.S. Sridharan. A computational theory of legal argument. Technical Report LRP-TR-13, Computer Science Department, Rutgers University~ 1981.
|
| |
32
|
L.T. McCarty and N.S. Sridharan. The representation of an evolving system of legal concepts: II. Prototypes and deformations. In Proceedings of the Seuenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 246-53, 1981.
|
| |
33
|
D.L. McOuinness. Reasoning with permissions and oblisations ~n contract law. Unpublished seminar paper, Rutgers University, 1986.
|
| |
34
|
|
 |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
|
| |
38
|
R. Reiter. A lo$ic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13:81-132, 1980.
|
| |
39
|
R. Reiter and G. Criscuolo. On interacting defaults. In Proceedings of the Seventh International $oint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 270-276, 1981.
|
 |
40
|
|
 |
41
|
M. J. Sergot , F. Sadri , R. A. Kowalski , F. Kriwaczek , P. Hammond , H. T. Cory, The British Nationality Act as a logic program, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.5, p.370-386, May 1986
[doi> 10.1145/5689.5920]
|
| |
42
|
|
| |
43
|
N.S. Sridharan. Representing knowledge in AIMDS. inforrnatica e Diritto, 7:201-221, 1981.
|
| |
44
|
N.S. Sridharan. Evolving systems of knowlcdse. AI Magazine, 6:108-120, 1985.
|
| |
45
|
|
 |
46
|
|
| |
47
|
L.A. Wallcn. Matrix proof methods for modal logics. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 917- 923, 1987.
|
|