|
 REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
The Hearsay Rule Advisor (c) (1988) was developed by Susan J. Blackman and Marilyn T. MaeCrimmon. The support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, IBM, the Law Foundation of British Columbia, and Tecknowledge Inc. is gratefully acknowledged. The commercial expert shell M. 1 (Formerly available from Teknowledge Inc. of Palo Alto, California) was used to build the knowledge base. Details of the program are described in the LL.M. thesis by Susan J. Blackman, "Expert Systems in Case-Based Law' The Rule Against Hearsay" (1988). Figure I is from this thesis. The case database is programmed in dBASE III PLUS, a product of Ashton-Tate.
|
| |
2
|
Smith and Deedman, "The Application of Expert Systems Technology to Casebased Law" in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Boston, Mass) The Center for Law and Computer Science, Northeastern University, 1987 at 84-93.
|
| |
3
|
in an extended version of this paper available from the Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia, I consider the implications of the literature on fact finding for the building of expert systems in law and illustrate how some of these concepts could be used to identify relevant sets of facts which establish the factual propositions of the legal rule. See e.g, Wigmore, The Science of Judicial Proof as_ ...... G i. vLen b v___Logic. Psvch o!ogv and Q~en e r a.l__E x o eri__e_n c e -_h-~nd I llust r ate d_-i_} n Judicial Trials (1937, 3rd ed.); Binder, Fact Investigation ( 1984); Moore, "Inferential Streams: The Articulation and Illustration of the Trial Advocate's Evidentiary Intuitions" (1987), 34 UCLA Law Rev. 611; Schum, Evidence and Inference for the Intelligence Ana- (1987); Svmoosium on Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence (1986), 66 Boston University Law Review.
|
| |
4
|
Wigmore, Evide. n e.e (Chadbourn Rev., 1974) Vol. 5 pars. 1420-1425.
|
| |
5
|
See e.g., such as McCormick, Handbook of the Law of Evidence (1954) at 633. Ares v. Venner {1970} S.C.R. 608; Foote v. Foote {1986} 6 W.W.R. 474 (B.C.S.C.).
|
| |
6
|
Tribe, "Triangulating Hearsay" (1974), 87 Harv. L.Rev. 957. This analysis is reproduced in several evidence casebooks. See e.g, Lempert and Saltzburg, A Modern Aooroaeh to Evidence (1982).
|
| |
7
|
Supra note 2.
|
| |
8
|
See e.g., Pennington and Hastie, "Evidence Evaluation in Complex Decision Making" (1986), 51 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 242; Bennett, and Feldman, R econstructin~ Reality in the C.ourtroom (1981); Jackson, Law. Fact and Narrative Coherence (1988).
|
| |
9
|
The word dimension is used in its traditional mathematical sense.
|
| |
10
|
Copyright (c) 1985, 1986 Ashton-Tate.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
See e.g., Swift, "A Foundation Approach to Hearsay~ (1987), 75 Calif. Law Rev. 1341.
|
|
Adobe Acrobat
QuickTime
Windows Media Player
Real Player
Pdf
I.2