ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Amalgamating regulation- and case-based advice systems through suggested answers
Full text PdfPdf (532 KB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 63 - 67  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-322-1
Author
D. E. Wolstenholme  BP Research International, Chertsey Road, Sunbuty, Middlesex, TW16 7LN, U.K.
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 6,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74014.74023
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a method whereby regulation- and case-based systems may be amalgamated in logic-based advice systems through the use of suggested answers, originally used in a non-legal domain. These are based on relationships, declared at the meta-level, between generalized cases and the vague concepts of the regulations; satisfaction of the conditions derived from cases is not, however, seen as implying that the vague concepts hold, merely as being indicative of them. The resulting systems allow the user free interpretation of the vague concepts, but provide help with interpretation, if required, based on the cases; they also provide clear separation of regulations and cases.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ashley, K.D. and Rissland, E.L., 1987. Compare and Contrast, A Test of Expertise. In: Procs. 6th AAAI.
 
2
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., 1989. Practical Legal Expert Systems: The relation between a formalisation of law and expert knowledge. In: Computer, Law and AI (eds. Bennum, M. and Naryanan, A.), Ablex.
 
3
 
4
Lakhani, H.M., 1988. Stock Exchange Regulations in Logic. MSc Thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College.
 
5
Sergot, M.J., 1983, A query-the-user facility for logic programming. In: Integrated Intcra;ctive Computer Systems (eds. Degano, P. and Sandewall, E), North- Holland,
6
 
7
Susskind, R.E., 1986. Expert systems in law: A jurisprudential approach to artificial intelligence and legal reasoning, in: The Modem Law Review 49.
 
8
Wolstenholme, D.E. and Hammond, P., 1988. Sigma-APES User Manual. Logic Based Systems, Richmond, Surrey, U.K.
 
9
Wolstenholme, D.E. and O'Brien, C.M., 1987. GLIMPSE - a statistical adventure. In: Procs. 10th IICAI, Milan.