|
 REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
PRO~ stands for PROtotype of a Legal EXpert System. The project is sponsored by the Dutch Computer Science Stimulation Plan (SPIN), Apollo Computer Inc. (since 1986) and IBM (since 1988).
|
| |
2
|
We also see legal expert systems as part of an integrated legal informatics systems, integrating expert systems with e.g. legal information retrieval systems (Oskamp, A., Vandenberghe, G.P.V., Lelal thinking and automation in Martino, A.A., Socci Natali, F. (eds.), Automated Analysis of Lel~l Texts, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986. In 1990 we will try to connect PROLEXS to the Kluwcr databank.
|
| |
3
|
Berg, P.H. van den, Oskamp, A., PROLEXSt a .user oriented al)l~roach, in Erdmann U., Fiedler H., Haft, F., Traunmiiller (eds), Computergestiitzte juristische Expertensysteme, Attempto Verlag, Tiibingen, 1986.
|
| |
4
|
See also Oskamp, A., Building legal expert systems: PRO- LEXS, a different apl~ch, in Bing, J. (ed.), Lex Golem, to be published, and Oskamp, A., Ex~nsvstemen en hun toepassin~ in bet reeht~ Ars Aequi, Special Reehtsinformatica, november 1986
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Oskampt A., Building .... legal expert s~tems: PROLEXS, a different approach, in Bing, J. (ed.), Lex Golem, to be published, and Oskamp, A., F_.xc~rtsystemen en hun toe~ssing in het recht, Ars Aequi, Special Rechtsinformatica, november 1986
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Oskamp, A. Knowledge representation and lepta! expert systems, in Vandenbcrghe, G. (ed.), Advanced Topics of Law and Information Teehnololzv, Kluwer Deventer, 1989
|
| |
9
|
See also Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B. Case-~sed Reasoninff in a Rule-Governed Domain, 1988, p. 3
|
| |
10
|
Oskamp, A., Juridische ex~rtsvstcmen, thesis, to appear
|
| |
11
|
See Walker, R.F., Berg, P.H. van den, PROLEXS, an obicct o_riented legal ~rt ~,atem, in Hertestad, H. and Maesel, D., Five art. !cl.cs on AI and la% Complex series 1988/5, Oslo.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
of. Susskind, o~ p. 56-61, where he states that it is better not to embody expert knowledge in legal expert systems yet. In our opinion this expert knowledge is absolutely henry to open the possibility of even potential usefulness of legal expert systems.
|
| |
14
|
A more detailed description of this aspect of PROLEXS can be found in Walker, R.F., Berg P.H. van den, Zeinstra, P.G.M., A model to model knowledge about knowledge, in Vandenberghe G.P.V. (ed.), Advanced Topics of Law and Information TechnoloRv, Kluwer Deventer, 1989}.
|
| |
15
|
At least one of the requests made by the reasoning mechanisms is rewarded. Therefore at least one such mechanism can proceed.
|
| |
16
|
PROLEXS distinguishes dates and periods, with notation dd/mm/yy. It provides operators like datc+(datc, period), yielding a date, ~date, date), yielding a period or date.. (date, period), which yields a date. More operators exist as well as predicates like bcfo~ after, smaller than, etc.
|
| |
17
|
For mote details about the abstraction finder see Walker, R.F., Berg P.H. van den, Zeinstra, P.G.M., A model to model knowledge about knowledge, in Vandenberghe G.P.V. (ed.), Advanced Topics of Law and Information Technolo~/, Kluwer Deventer, 1989}.
|
CITED BY 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Poulin , Paul Bratley , Jacques Frémont , Ejan Mackaay, Legal interpretation in expert systems, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.90-99, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
|
G. J. van Opdorp , R. F. Walker , J. A. Schrickx , C. Groendijk , P. H. van den Berg, Networks at work: a connectionist approach to non-deductive legal reasoning, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.278-287, May 1991, Oxford, England
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adobe Acrobat
QuickTime
Windows Media Player
Real Player
Pdf
I.2