ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Deep models, normative reasoning and legal expert systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.13 MB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 37 - 45  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-322-1
Author
T. J. M. Bench-Capon  Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74014.74020
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the role of deep models and deontic logic in legal expert systems. Whilst much research work insists on the importance of both these features, legal expert systems are being built using shallow models and no more propositional logic, and are claimed to be successful in use. There is then a prima facie conflict between findings of research and commercial practice, which this paper explores, and attempts to explain.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Bench-Capon 1988a. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Logical Models of Legislation and Expert Systems, in Expert Systems and Law, H. Fiedler, F. Haft and T. Traunmuller (eds), Attempto Verlag, Tuebingen, 1988.
 
3
Bench-Capon 1988b. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Applying Legal Expert Systems Techniques: Practical Considerations, in KBS in Government 1988, P. Duffin (ed), Blenheim Online Publications, Pinner, 1988.
 
4
Bench-Capon 1989a. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Practical Legal Expert Systems: the Relationship Between a Formalisation of Law and Expert Knowledge, in M.Bennun and A.Narayanan (eds) Computers, Law and AI, Ablex, 1989.
 
5
 
6
Bobrow 1984. Bobrow, D., (ed) Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems, published as Artificial Intelligence Journal, vol 24, December, 1984.
 
7
Capper and Susskind 1988. P. Capper and R.E. Susskind, Latent Damage Law - The Expert System, Butterworths, 1988.
 
8
Herrestad 1988. H. Herrestad, Some problems Conceming the Representation of Legal Norms, 1st Scandinavian Conference on AI, 1988.
 
9
 
10
McCarty 1977. L.Thome McCarty, Reflections on TAXMAN: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning, Harvard Law Review 90, 837- 93.
 
11
McCarty 1983. L. Thome McCarty, Permissions and Obligations, Proceedings of the Eighth iJCAI, 1983.
 
12
McCarty 1984. L. Thome McCarty, Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Problems and Prospects, in Data Processing and the Law, C.Campbell (ed), Sweet and Maxwell, London 1984.
13
 
14
 
15
Sergot 1986. M.J. Sergot, H.T. Cory, P. Hammond, R.A. Kowalski, F. Kdwaczek, and F. Sadri, Formalisation of the British Nationality Act. In Yearbook of Law, Computers and Technology, Vol 2, C.Amold (ed), Butterworths, London 1986.
 
16
 
17
 
18

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
T. J. M. Bench-Capon: colleagues