ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
EPS II: estate planning with prototypes
Full text PdfPdf (1.09 MB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-322-1
Authors
D. A. Schlobohm  Stanford Law School and Greene, Radovsky, Maloney and Share
L. T. McCarty  Computer Science Department and Faculty of Law, Rutgers University
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/74014.74015
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Drafting California Irrevocable Living Trusts. California Continuing Education of the BaL 1987. Second Edition.
 
2
 
3
K.J. Hammond. CHEF: A model of case-based planning, in Proceedings, AAAl-88, pages 267- 271, 1986.
 
4
T. Huynh and C. L,,se,. A ~LP(~) options tradinS analysis system. In R.A. Kowalski and K.A. Bowen, editors, Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Fifth Inte,national Conference and Symposium, pages 59-69. MIT Press, 1988.
5
 
6
L.T. McCarty. Permissions and obligations. In Proceedinga of the Eighth International Yoint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 287-294, 1983.
 
7
L.T. McCarty. Permissions and obligations: An informal introduction. In A.A. Martino and F. bocci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Tezts: Logic, informatics, Law, pages 307-337. Elsevier North-Honand, 1986. Also available as Rutgers Technical Report LRP-TR-19.
 
8
L.T. McCarty. Intelligent legal information systems: An update. In H. Fiedler, F. Haft, and R. Ttaunmii!!er, editors, Ezpert Slletems in Law: Impacts on Legal Theory and Computer Law, pages 15-25. Attempto-Verlag, Tftbingen, 1988. Also published in Law and Computers, No. 5, pp. 196- 202 (Law and Computers Association of Japan, July 1987).
 
9
L.T. McC&rty. Computing with prototypes (preliminary report}. Technical Report LRP-TR-22, Computer Science Department, Rutgers Univerairy, Ma~ch 1989.
10
 
11
L.T. McCarty and N.S. Sridhazan. A computational theory of legal argument. Technical Report LRP-TR-13, Computer Science Department, Rutgets University, 1981.
 
12
L.T. McCarty and N.S. Sridharan. The representation of an evolving system of legal concepts' Ii. Prototypes and deformations. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 246-53, 1981.
 
13
R.H. Michaelsen. An expert system for federal tax planning. Ezpert Systems, 1(2):149-167, 1984. Tioga Publishing Co., Palo Alto, 1980.
 
14
 
15
H. Raiffa. Decision Analysis: introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. Addison-Wesley, 1968.
 
16
17
 
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
D. A. Schlobohm: colleagues
L. T. McCarty: colleagues