ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
On the parallel decomposability of geometric problems
Full text PdfPdf (1.30 MB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the fifth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Saarbruchen, West Germany
Pages: 104 - 113  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-318-3
Authors
M. J. Atallah  Purdue University
J. J. Tsay  Purdue University
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/73833.73845
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There is a large and growing body of literature concerning the solution of geometric problems on mesh-connected arrays of processors [5,9,14,17]. Most of these algorithms are optimal (i.e., run in time &Ogr;(n1/d) on a d-dimensional n-processor array), and they all assume that the parallel machine is trying to solve a problem of size n on an n-processor array. What happens when we have parallel machine for efficiently solving a problem of size p, and we are interested in using it to solve a problem of size n < p? The answer to that question has to do with a fundamental, and yet (at least so far) little-studied property of geometric problems: their parallel-decomposability. More specifically, given that a problem of size p can be solved on a parallel machine P faster by a factor of (say) s(p) than on a RAM alone, then that problem is fully parallel-decomposable for P if a RAM to which the parallel machine P is attached can solve arbitrarily large problems with a speedup of also s(p) when compared to a RAM alone. The issue has been settled for the sorting problem when P is a linear systolic array [1,2,3,11]. Here we show that many geometric problems are fully parallel-decomposable for (multidimensional) mesh-connected arrays of processors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
R. Beige1 and J. Gill, Sorting tt Objects with a k-sorter, TRCS, The Johns Hopkins University, Apr. 1987.
4
 
5
B. Chazelle, Computational Geometry on a Systolic Chip, IEEE Trans. on Computers, pp. 774- 785, Sept. 1984.
 
6
G.N. Frederickson and D.B. Johnson, The Complexity of Selection and Ranking in X + Y and Matrices with Sorted Columns, JCSS, pp. 197- 208, 1982.
 
7
 
8
R.H. Giiting, Optimal Divide-and-Conquer to Compute Measure and Contour for a Set of Iso- Rectangles, Acta Informatica, pp. 271-291, 1984.
 
9
C. S. Jeong and D. T. Lee, Parallel Geometric Algorithms on a Mesh Connected Computer, TR, 87-0%FC-01, Dept. EE/CS, Northwestern Univ., 1987. To appear in Algorithmica.
10
 
11
D.T. Lee and H. Chang and C.K. Wong, An onchip compare steer bubble sorter, IEEE Trans. Computers, pp. 396-405, 1981.
 
12
D.T. Lee and F.P. Preparata, Computational Geometry-A Survey, IEEE Trans. on Computers, pp. 872-1101, 1984.
 
13
 
14
R. Miller and Q. F. Stout, Mesh Computer Algorithms for Computational Geometry, TR 86-18, Dept. of CS, SUNY at Buffalo, 1986.
 
15
 
16
17


Collaborative Colleagues:
M. J. Atallah: colleagues
J. J. Tsay: colleagues