A procedure for evaluating human-computer interface development tools

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

A procedure for evaluating human-computer interface development tools

Full text

Pdf (947 KB)

Source

Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology archive
Proceedings of the 2nd annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents

Williamsburg, Virginia, United States

Pages: 53 - 61

Year of Publication: 1989

ISBN:0-89791-335-3

Author

D. Hix

Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 16, Citation Count: 1

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/73660.73667 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Arble, F. (1988). Private communication.
	2	Nathaniel S. Borenstein, The evaluation of text editors: a critical review of the Roberts and Morgan methodology based on new experiments, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.99-105, April 1985, San Francisco, California, United States
	3	A. M. Cohill , D. M. Gilfoil , J. V. Pilitsis, Measuring the utility of application software, Advances in human-computer interaction, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1988
	4	Teresa L. Roberts , Thomas P. Moran, The evaluation of text editors: methodology and empirical results., Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.4, p.265-283, April 1983 [doi>10.1145/2163.2164]
	5	Totten, S. (1989). Private communication.