ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Specifying composite illustrations with communicative goals
Full text PdfPdf (1.17 MB)
Source Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology archive
Proceedings of the 2nd annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents
Williamsburg, Virginia, United States
Pages: 1 - 9  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-335-3
Authors
D. D. Seligmann  Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, New York
S. Feiner  Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, New York
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/73660.73661
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

IBIS (Intent-Based Illustration System) generates illustrations automatically, guided by communicative goals. Communicative goals specify that particular properties of objects, such as their color, size, or location are to be conveyed in the illustration. IBIS is intended to be part of an interactive multimedia explanation generation system. It has access to a knowledge base that contains a collection of objects, including information about their geometric properties, material, and location. As the goals are interpreted by a rule-based control component, the system generates a precise definition of the final illustration. If IBIS determines that a set of goals cannot be satisfied in a single picture, then it attempts to create a composite illustration that has multiple viewports. For example, a composite illustration may contain a nested inset illustration showing an object in greater detail than is possible in the parent picture. Each component illustration is defined by its placement, size, viewing specification, lighting specification, and list of objects to be displayed and their graphical style.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

Beach and Stone 83
 
Culbert 88
Culbert, C. CLIPS Reference Manual. NASA/Johnson Space Center, TX, 1988.
 
Elhadad, Seligmann, Feiner, and McKeown 89
Elhadad, M., Seligmann, D-D., Feiner, S., McKeown, K. A Common Intention Description Language for Interactive Multi-Media Systems. To appear in Proc. IJCAI-89 Workshop on Intelligent Interfaces, Detroit, Michigan, August 22, 1989.
 
Feiner 85
Feiner, S. "APEX: An Experiment in the Automated Creation of Pictorial Explanations." IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 5:1 I, November 1985, pp. 29-38.
 
Feiner 88a
Feiner, S. An Architecture for Knowledge- Based Graphical Interfaces. Proc. ACM SIGCHI Workshop on Architectures for Intelligent Interfaces, Monterey, April, 1988, pp. 129-140.
 
Feiner 88b
 
Feiner and McKeown 89
Feiner, S. and McKeown, K. Interactive Multimedia Explanation for Equipment Maintenance and Repair. Technical Report CUCS-449-89, Columbia Univ. Dept. of Comp. Sci., 1989,
Friedeli 84
 
Halliday 85
Halliday, M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London, 1985.
 
Kurlander and Feiner 88
Kurlander, D. and Feiner, S. Editable Graphical Histories. Proc. 1988 IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, Pittsburgh, October lo-12,1988, pp. 127-134.
Mackinlay 86
 
Neiman 82
Neiman, D. Graphical Animation from Knowledge. Proc. AAAI 82, Pittsburgh, PA, August 18-20,1982, pp. 373-376.
Thibault and Naylor 87

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
D. D. Seligmann: colleagues
S. Feiner: colleagues