ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computing Euclidean maximum spanning trees
Full text PdfPdf (666 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States
Pages: 241 - 251  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-89791-270-5
Authors
C. Monma  Bell Communications Research, Morristown
M. Paterson  University of Warwick, Coventry, England
S. Suri  Bell Communications Research, Morristown
F. Yao  Xerox PARC, Palo Alto
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/73393.73418
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An algorithm is presented for finding a maximum-weight spanning tree of a set of n points in the Euclidean plane, where the weight of an edge (pi, pj) equals the Euclidean distance between the points pi and pj. The algorithm runs in time &Ogr; (n logn) and requires &Ogr; (n) space. If the points are vertices of a convex polygon (given in order along the boundary), then our algorithm requires only a linear amount of time and space. These bounds are the best possible in the algebraic computation-tree model. We also establish various properties of maximum spanning trees that can be exploited to solve other geometric problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
A. Aggarwal, M. Klawe, S. Moran, P. Shor and R. Wilber, Geometric applications of a matrix searching algorithm, Algorithmica 2, 1987, pp. 195-208.
 
3
D. Avis, Diameter Partitioning, Discrete and Computational Geometry, 1, 1986, pp. 265-276.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
R. Graham and P. Hell, On the history of minimum spanning tree problem, Annals of History of Computing, 7, 1985.
 
8
S.C. Johnson, Hierarchical clustering schemes, Psychometrika, 32, 1967, pp. 241-254.
 
9
D.S. Johnson, NP-completeness column, J. of Algorithms 3, 1982.
 
10
D.T. Lee, Farthest point Voronoi diagrams and applications, TR 80-11-FC-04, Northwestern University, 1980.
 
11
 
12
M.L Shamos, Computational Geometry, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI, 1978.
 
13
R.R. Sokal and P.H. Sneath, Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1963.
 
14
G.T. Toussaint and B.K. Bhattacharya, On geometric algorithms that use the furthestpoint Voronoi diagrams, TR SOCS-81.3, McGill University, 1981.
 
15
A.C. Yao, On constructing minimum spanning trees in k-dimensional spaces and related problems, SIAM J. of Computing 11, 1982, pp. 721-736.
 
16
R.A. Jarvis, Shared near neighbor maximal spanning trees for cluster analysis, Proc. of Fourth Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition, Kyoto, Japan, 1978.


Collaborative Colleagues:
C. Monma: colleagues
M. Paterson: colleagues
S. Suri: colleagues
F. Yao: colleagues