ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Algorithms for diametral pairs and convex hulls that are optimal, randomized, and incremental
Full text PdfPdf (528 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States
Pages: 12 - 17  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-89791-270-5
Authors
K. L. Clarkson  AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey
P. W. Shor  AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/73393.73395
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We give a simple algorithmic technique for building geometric structures. The technique is randomized and incremental. As an application, we give an algorithm of this kind for computing the intersection of a set of halfspaces in three dimensions. (This intersection problem is linear-time equivalent to the computation of the convex hull of a point set.) The algorithm requires &Ogr;(n log n) expected time, where the expectation is over the random behavior of the algorithm. A similar algorithm can be used to determine the intersection of a set of unit balls in E3, the problem of spherical intersection. This problem arises in the computation of the diameter of a point set in E3. For a set S of n points, the diameter of S is the greatest distance between two points in S. We give a randomized reduction from the problem of determining the diameter to the problem of computing spherical intersections, resulting in a Las Vegas algorithm for the diameter requiring &Ogr;(n log n) expected time. The best algorithms previously known for this problem have worst-case time bounds no better than &Ogr;(nn log n) [Agg].


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Agg
A. Aggarwal. personal communication.
 
Che86
L.P. Chew. Building Voronoi diagrams for convex polygons in linear expected time. unpublished manuscript, 1986.
Cla88
 
Ede87
 
EKS83
H. Edelsbrunner, D. G. Kirkpatrick, and R. Seidel. On the shape of a set of points in the plane. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, IT-29:551-559, 1983.
 
EOS86
 
Hep56
A. Heppes. Beweis einer Vermutung von A. V~zsonyi. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar., 7:463-466, 1956.
PH77
 
PS85

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
K. L. Clarkson: colleagues
P. W. Shor: colleagues