ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times
Full text PdfPdf (1.45 MB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the twenty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 574 - 586  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-307-8
Authors
A. K. Chandra  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
P. Raghavan  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
W. L. Ruzzo  Dept. of Computer Science, FR-35, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
R. Smolensky  Dept. of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 89,   Citation Count: 30
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/73007.73062
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

View an n-vertex, m-edge undirected graph as an electrical network with unit resistors as edges. We extend known relations between random walks and electrical networks by showing that resistance in this network is intimately connected with the lengths of random walks on the graph. For example, the commute time between two vertices s and t (the expected length of a random walk from s to t and back) is precisely characterized by the effective resistance Rst between s and t: commute time = 2mRst. Additionally, the cover time (the expected length of a random walk visiting all vertices) is characterized by the maximum resistance R in the graph to within a factor of log n: mR ≤ cover time ≤ O (mR log n). For many graphs, the bounds on cover time obtained in this manner are better than those obtained from previous techniques such as the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix. In particular, using this approach, we improve known bounds on cover times for various classes of graphs, including high-degree graphs, expanders, and multi-dimensional meshes. Moreover, resistance seems to provide an intuitively appealing and tractable approach to these problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
David J. Aldous. Random walks on large graphs, 1988. Unpublished Monograph, Berkeley.
 
2
R. Aleliunas, R. M. Karp, R. J. Lipton, L. Lovgsz, and C. Rackoff. Random walks, universM traversal sequences, and the complexity of maze problems. In 20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, p~ges 218-223, San Juan, Puerto Rico, October 1979.
 
3
4
 
5
A. Z. Broder and A. R. Karlin. Bounds oIt covering times. In 29th Annual Symposium o~ Foundations of Computer Science, pages 479-- 487, White Plains, NY, October 1988.
 
6
J.T. Cox. Coalescing random walks and vote:r model consensus times on the torus, 1987. unpublished manuscript, CorneU.
 
7
Peter G. Doyle and J. Laurie Snell. Rando~ Walks and Electrical Networks. The Mathematical Association of America, 1984.
 
8
J. N. Franklin. Matrix Theory. Prentice-Hall, 1968.
 
9
 
10
F. GSbel and A. A. Jagers. Random walks oll graphs. Stochastic Proces,~es and their Applications, 2:311-336, 1974.
11
 
12
Jeff D. Kahn, Nathan Linial, Noam Nisan, and Michael E. Saks. On the cover time of randoIn walks in graphs. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 1, 1989. To Appear.
 
13
J.G. Kemeny, J. L. Snell. and A.W. KnapI~. Denumerable Markov Chains. The Universily Series in Higher Mathematics. Van Nostran(l, Princeton, NJ, 1966.
 
14
H. J. Landau and A. M. Odlyzko. Bounc.s for eigenvalues of certain stochastic matrices. Linear Algebra and Its A2plications, 38:5-1~, 1981.
 
15
Peter Mathews. Covering problems for random walks on spheres and finite groups. Technical Report TR 234, Stanford, Department of Statistics, 1985.
 
16
J. C. Maxwell. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Clarendon, 1918.
17
 
18
Ronitt Rubinfeld. Personal communication. 1989.
 
19
J.L. Synge. The fundamental theorem of electrical networks. Quarterly of Applied Math., 9:113-127, 1951.
 
20
W. Thomson and P.G. TaR. Treatise on Natural Philosophy. Cambridge, 1879.
 
21
David I. Zuckerman. A technique for lower bounding the cover time, 1989. Llnpublished manuscript, Berkeley.

CITED BY  32

Collaborative Colleagues:
A. K. Chandra: colleagues
P. Raghavan: colleagues
W. L. Ruzzo: colleagues
R. Smolensky: colleagues