| A zero-one law for Boolean privacy |
| Full text |
Pdf
(848 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 62 - 72
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-307-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
B. Chor
|
Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
|
|
E. Kushilevitz
|
Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 28, Citation Count: 8
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
A Boolean function ƒ: A1 X A2 X … X An → {0,1} is t - private if there exists a protocol for computing ƒ so that no coalition of size ≤ t can infer any additional information from the execution, other than the value of the function. We show that ƒ is ⌈n/2⌉ - private if and only if it can be represented as ƒ (x1, x2, …, xn) = ƒ (x1) ⊕ ƒ2(x2) ⊕ … ⊕ ƒn (xn, where the ƒi are arbitrary Boolean functions. It follows that if ƒ is ⌈n/2⌉ - private, then it is also n - private. Combining this with a result of Ben-Or, Goldwasser, and Wigderson, we derive an interesting “zero-one” law for private distributed computation of Boolean functions: Every Boolean function defined over a finite domain is either n - private, or it is ⌈n-1/2⌉ - private but not ⌈n/2⌉ - private.
We also investigate a weaker notion of privacy, where (a) coalitions are allowed to infer a limited amount of additional information, and (b) there is a probability of error in the final output of the protocol. We show that the same characterization of ⌈n/2⌉ - private Boolean functions holds, even under these weaker requirements. In particular, this implies that for Boolean functions, the strong and the weak notions of privacy are equivalent.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
Bh
|
|
 |
BGW
|
Michael Ben-Or , Shafi Goldwasser , Avi Wigderson, Completeness theorems for non-cryptographic fault-tolerant distributed computation, Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.1-10, May 02-04, 1988, Chicago, Illinois, United States
[doi> 10.1145/62212.62213]
|
 |
CCD
|
David Chaum , Claude Crépeau , Ivan Damgard, Multiparty unconditionally secure protocols, Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.11-19, May 02-04, 1988, Chicago, Illinois, United States
[doi> 10.1145/62212.62214]
|
 |
GMW
|
|
| |
PS
|
Paturi, R., and J. Simon, "Probabilistic communication complexity", Proc. of ~5th FOC$, 1984, pp. 118-126.
|
| |
Ya
|
Yao, A. C., "How to Generate and Exchange Secrets", Proc. of 27th FO CS, 1986, pp. 162-167.
|
CITED BY 8
|
|
|
|
|
Uri Feige , Joe Killian , Moni Naor, A minimal model for secure computation (extended abstract), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.554-563, May 23-25, 1994, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|