ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
What best predicts computer proficiency?
Full text PdfPdf (802 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 32 ,  Issue 11  (November 1989) table of contents
Pages: 1322 - 1327  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Gerald E. Evans  Univ. of Montana, Missoula
Mark G. Simkin  Univ. of Nevada, Reno
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 90,   Citation Count: 22
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/68814.68817
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Identifying variables that predict computer aptitude can help educators and employers target potential students and employees. The authors examine a number of possible explanatory variables including demographic profiles, high school achievements, prior computer training and experience, cognitive styles, and problem-solving abilities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alspaugh, C.A. Identification of some components of computer programming aptitude. J. Research in Mathematics Education 3, 2 (Mar. 1972), 89-98.
 
2
Bateman, C.R. Predicting performance in a basic computer course. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences AIDS Press, Atlanta, GA, 1973.
 
3
Briggs, K.C., and Myers, I.B. Myers-Briggs type indicator, abbreviated version. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
4
5
6
 
7
 
8
Deckro, R.F., and Woundenberg, H.W. MBA admission criteria and academic success, Decision Sciences {Oct. 1977), 765-799.
 
9
Denelsky, G.Y., and McKee, M.G. Prediction of computer programmer training and job performance using the AABP test. Personal Psychology (1974), 129-137.
 
10
Evans, G.E. Learning to program computers by learning to solve problems. J. Education for Business 64, 2, 77-79.
 
11
Evans, G.E., and Simkin, M.G. Student backgrounds and computer abilities: How closely are they related? Proceedings of the Western Regional Conference of the Data Processing Management Association (Reno, Nev., Sept. 1987), pp. 1-6.
 
12
Fowler, G.E., and Glorfeld, L.W. Predicting aptitude in introductory computing: A classification model. AEDS J. 14, 2 (Winter I981}, 96- 109.
13
 
14
Hostetler, T.R. Predicting student success in an introductory programming course. In Proceedings of NECC5, IEEE Press, Silver Spring, MD, 1983.
 
15
Konvalina, J., Stephens, L., and Wileman, S. Identifying factors influencing computer science aptitude and achievement. AEDS J. 16, 2 (Winter 1983), 106-112.
16
17
 
18
Petersen, C.C., and Howe, T.G. Predicting academic success in introduction to computers AEDS J. (Summer 1979), 182-191.
 
19
Stevens, D.J. Cognitive processes and success of students in instructional computer courses. AEDS J. (Summer 1983), 228-233.
 
20
Stevens, L.J., Wileman, S., and Konvalina, J. Group differences in computer aptitude. AEDS J. (Winter 1981), 84-95.
 
21
Webb, N.M. Microcomputer learning in small groups: Cognitive requirements and group processes. J. Educational Psychology 76 6 (Dec. 1984), 1076-1088.
 
22

CITED BY  22


REVIEW

"Robert McLean Aiken : Reviewer"

The authors have done a thorough job of reviewing and summarizing the previous literature on this topic. They report findings from a study they conducted, which examined a number of possible explanatory variables including demographic profiles  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gerald E. Evans: colleagues
Mark G. Simkin: colleagues