Four paradigms of information systems development

ABSTRACT

Developing computer-based information systems necessarily involves making a number of implicit and explicit assumptions. The authors examine four different approaches to information systems development.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alexander, J., Ed. Neofunctionalism. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1985.
• 2: Alter, S. Decision Support Systems: Current Practice and Continuing Challenges. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1980.
• 3: Argyris, C. Reasoning, Learning and Action: Individual and Organizat/ond. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1982.
• 4: Argyris, C., and Schon, D. ~a>ry /n 3wtm Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1974.
• 5: J. Banbury, Towards a framework for systems analysis practice, Critical issues in information systems research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
• 6: Bardach, E. The Implementation Game. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1977.
• 7: Bariff, M. and Oinzberg, M. MIS and the behavioural sciences. Data Base. 13,1 (1982), 19-26.
• 8: Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. The Social Construction of Reality:A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday, New York, 1967.
• 9: Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. The application perspective-another way of conceiving systems development and EDP-based systems. In The Seventh Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering, M. Saaksjarvi, Ed. (Helsinki, Finland, Aug. 1984).
• 10: Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. FLORENCE in wonderland-systems development with nurses. Paper presented at the Conference on Development and Use of Computer-Based Systems and Tools (Aarhus, Denmark, Aug. 1985).
• 11: Bodker, S., Ehn, P., Romberger, S., and Sjogren, D. The UTOPIA Project: An alternative in text and images. Gr0~ 7 (May 1985).
• 12: Boland, R. Phenomenology: A preferred approach to research in information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald et al., Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 193-202.
• 13: Boland, R. and Day, W. The process of systems design: A phenomenological approach. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on ln)'ormation Systems (Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 1982), 31-45.
• 14: Bostrom, R. and Heinen, S., MIS problems and failures: A sociotechnical perspective--Part I: The causes. MIS Quart. 1, 3 (Sept. 1977), 17-32.
• 15: Braverman, H. Labour and Monopoly Capital. Monthly Review Press, New York, 1974.
• 16: Briefs, U. Participatory systems design as approach for a workers' production policy. In Systems Design For, With, end By the users. U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
• 17: Briefs, U., Ciborra, C. and Schneider, L., Eds., Systems Design For, With and By the Users. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 198 3.
• 18: Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Heinemann, London, 197 9.
• 19: H L Capron , P L Clark, Casebook for systems analysis and design, Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1986
• 20: Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester, 1981.
• 21: Chua, W. Radical developments in accounting thought. Account. Rev. 61, 4 (Oct. 1986), 601-632.
• 22: Ciborra, C. Information systems and transactions architecture. Inter. Policy Anal. In/o. Syst. 5, 4 (1981), 30S-323.
• 23: Coser, L. The Functions of Social Conflict. Free Press, New York, 1956.
• 24: Couger, J. D., Colter, M., and Knapp, R. Advanced Systems Development/Feasibility Techniques. Wiley, New York, 1982.
• 25: Ron Dagwell , Ron Weber, System designers' user models: a comparitive study and methodological critique, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.11, p.987-997, Nov. 1983 [doi>10.1145/182.358465]
• 26: Gordon B. Davis , Margrethe H. Olson, Management information systems: conceptual foundations, structure, and development (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1984
• 27: DeMarc0, T. StructuredAnalysis andSystem Specification. Yourdon Press, New York, 1978.
• 28: Pelle Ehn, Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1990
• 29: Ehn, P., Kyng, M., and Sundblad, Y. The UTOPIA Project: On training, technology, and products viewed from the quality of work perspective. In Systems Design For, With and By the Users. U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 439-449.
• 30: Ehn, P. and Sandberg, A. Local union influence on technology and work organization: Some results from the DEMOS project. Systems D es/gn liar; Wilh ond By the Users U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 427-437.
• 31: Faia, M. Dynamic Functionalism: Strategy and Tactics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
• 32: Fay, B. Social Theory andPoZi/icag Practice. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1975.
• 33: Chris P. Gane , Trish Sarson, Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1979
• 34: Garfinkel, H. Studies in Ethnorr~tMtdogy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 106'7.
• 35: Goldkuhl, G., and Lyytinen, K. A language action view of informat ion systems. In Proceedings of the Third Znternational Conference on Information Systems. M. Ginzberg and C. Ross, Eds., Ann Arbor, Mich. 1982, pp. 13-30.
• 36: Griethuysen, V., Ed. Concepts and Terminology of the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base. IS0 Report No. ISO/TC97/SCs/ N695, 1982.
• 37: Gutting, G., Ed., Paradigms and Revolutions. University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend, Ind., 1980.
• 38: Habermas, J. Theory and Practice. Heinemann, London, 1974.
• 39: Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume One- Reason and the Rationalization of 5~ciety. Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.
• 40: Harmon, P. and King, D. Expert S&ems. Wiley, New York, 1985.
• 41: Frederick Hayes-Roth, Knowledge-based expert systems, Computer, v.17 n.10, p.263-273, Oct. 1984 [doi>10.1109/MC.1984.1658976]
• 42: Hedberg, B. and Mumford, E. The designof computer systems: Man's vision of man as an integral part of the system design process. In Human Choice and Computers. E. Mumford and H. Sackman, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 31-59.
• 43: Hirschheim, R. Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. In Research Methods in Information Sysfems. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, R. Fitzberald et al., Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 13-38.
• 44: Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. Paradigms and methodologies: An analysis of their underlying philosophical assumptions. Templeton College, Oxford, working paper, 1988.
• 45: Proceedings of the international conference on Information systems, December 1998
• 46: Hopper, T. and Powell, A. Making sense of research into the organizational and social aspects of management accounting: A review of its underlying assumptions. }. Manage. Stud (Sept. 1985), 429-465.
• 47: I toward, R. UTOPIA: Where workers craft new technology. Tech. Rev. 88, 3 (Apr. 1985),43-49.
• 48: M. A Jackson, System development (Prentice-Hall International series in computer science), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1983
• 49: Peter G. W. Keen, Information systems and organizational change, Communications of the ACM, v.24 n.1, p.24-33, Jan. 1981 [doi>10.1145/358527.358543]
• 50: Klein, H. and Hirschheim, R. Issues and approaches to appraising !cchnological change in the office: A consequentialist perspective. Of fice: Tech. People 2, (1983), 15-42.
• 51: Klein, H. and Hirschheim, R. Fundamental issues of decision support systems: A consequentialist perspective. Decis. Supp. Syst. 2, 1 (Jan, 1985), 5-23.
• 52: H. K. Klein , R. Hirschheim, Social change and the future of information systems development, Critical issues in information systems research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
• 53: klein, H. and Lyytinen, K. The poverty of scientism in information ~vstems. In Research Methods in Information Systems. E. Mumford, R. t iirschheim, G. Fitzgerald et al., Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1!t85. pp. 131-161.
• 54: Rob Kling, Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.12 n.1, p.61-110, March 1980 [doi>10.1145/356802.356806]
• 55: Kubicek, H. User participation in systems design: Some questions about structure and content arising from recent research from a trade union perspective. In Systems Design For, With and By the Users. U. Briefs, C. Cib0rra, and L. Schneider, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 3-18.
• 56: Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2d ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.
• 57: Kumar, K. and Welke, R. Implementation failure and system developer values: Assumptions, truisms, and empirical evidence. In Proceedings o{ the Fifth Znternational Conference on Information Systems. (Tucson, Ariz., 1984), 1-13.
• 58: Kyng, M. and Ehn, P. STARDUST memories: Scandinavian tradition and research on development and use of systems and tools. Paper presented at the Conference on Development and Use of Computer-Based Systems and Tools (Aarhus, Denmark, Aug. 1985).
• 59: Lanzara, G. and Mathiassen, L. Mapping situations within a system development project- a n intervention perspective on organizational change. DIAMI PB-179, University of Aarhus, Denmark, MARS Report No. 6, November 1984.
• 60: Laudan, L. Progress and lts Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1977.
• 61: Erkki Lehtinen , Kalle Lyytinen, Action based model of information system, Information Systems, v.11 n.4, p.299-317, Oct. 1986 [doi>10.1016/0306-4379(86)90010-4]
• 62: Lessnoff, M. The Structure of Social Science. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1974.
• 63: Henry C. Lucas, Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1981
• 64: M. Sundburg , G. Goldkuhl, Information Systems Development: A Systematic Approach, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1981
• 65: Lyytinen, K. Critical Social Theory and Information Systems-A Social Action Perspective to Information Systems. Ph.D. dissertation University of Jyvaskyla, Finland, 1986.
• 66: K. Lyytinen, A taxonomic perspective of information systems development: theoretical constructs and recommendations, Critical issues in information systems research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
• 67: Lyytinen, K. and Hirschheim, R. Information systems as rational discourse: An application of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Rationality. Scandinavian I. Manage. Stud. 4, 1/2 (1988}, 19-30.
• 68: Lyytinen, K. and Klein, H. The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Research Methods in Information Sysfems. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 219-236.
• 69: Lyytinen, K. and Lehtinen, E. On information modeling through ill0cuti0nary logic. In Proceedings of the Third Scandinavian Research Seminar on Information Modeling and Data Base Management (Tampere, Finland, 1984}, 35-1 15.
• 70: Madsen, M. Breakthrough by breakdown. In Znformation Systems Development for Human Progress in Organizations. H. Klein and K. Kumar, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, 41-53.
• 71: M. Lynne Markus, Power, politics, and MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.6, p.430-444, June 1983 [doi>10.1145/358141.358148]
• 72: Markus, M.L. Systems in Organizations: Bugs and Features. Pitman, Boston, 1984.
• 73: Mathiassen, L., and Bogh-Anderson, P. Systems development and use: A science of the truth or a theory of lies. In Computers and Democracy. G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng, eds. Aveburg, Aldershot, 1987, 395-417.
• 74: Mathiassen, L., R01sk0v, B. and Vedel, E. Regulating the use of EDP by law and agreements. In Systems Design For, With and By the Users. V. Briefs, C. Cib0rra, and L. Schneider Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, 251-264.
• 75: McCarthy, T. The Critical Theory of }urgen Habermas. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.
• 76: McGregor, D. The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.
• 77: Stephen M. McMenamin , John F. Palmer, Essential systems analysis, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1984
• 78: Mead, G. Mind, Sel! and Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1934.
• 79: Misgeld, D., Discourse and conversation: The theory of communicative competence and hermeneutics in the light of the debate between Habermas and Gadamer. Cultural Hermeneutics 4, (1977}.
• 80: Mitroff, I. Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1983.
• 81: Mumford, E. Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The ETHICS Method Manchester Business School Press, Manchester, 1983.
• 82: Naumann, J. and Jenkins, M., Prototyping: The new paradigm for systems development. MISQuart. 6, 3(Sept. 1982}. 29-44.
• 83: Newman, M. Managerial access to information: Strategies for prevention and promotion. }. Manage. Stucl, 22, 2 (Mar. 1985}, 193-211.
• 84: Newman, M. and Rosenberg, D. Systems analysts and the politics of organizational control. Omega 13, 5 {1985), 393-406.
• 85: Ojelanki Kayana Ngwenyama, Fundamental issues of knowledge acquisition: toward a human action perspective of knowledge systems, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, 1988
• 86: T. William Olle , A. A. Verrijn Stuart , H. G. Sol, Information Systems Design Methodologies; A Comparative Review: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Comparative Review of Information Systems Design Methodologies, Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands, 10-14 May 1982, Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, 1982
• 87: Ollo, T. W., Sol, H. and Tully, C. Eds. Information Sy& De~ Methodologies: A Feature Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
• 88: Proc. of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on Information systems design methodologies: improving the practice, July 1986
• 89: Pettigrew, A. The Politics ol Organizational Decision Making. Tavistock, London, 1973.
• 90: Quine, W. and Ullian, J. ~he Web of Belie/, Random House, New York, 1970.
• 91: Reason, P. and Rowan. J., Eds. Humanlmtuiry:A Sourcebook ol New Paradigm Research. Wiley, Chichester, 1981.
• 92: Sandberg, A. Socio-technical design, trade union strategies and action research. In Research Methods in lnformation Sysfems. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald and A. T. Wood-Harper, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, 79-92.
• 93: Silverman, D. The Theory ol Organizations. Heinemann, London, 1970.
• 94: Teichroew, D. and David, G., Eds. System Description Methodologies. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.
• 95: Van Maanen, J. Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24, 4 (Dec. 1979), 520-526.{
• 96: Nicholas P. Vitalari , Gary W. Dickson, Problem solving for effective systems analysis: an experimental exploration, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.11, p.948-956, Nov. 1983 [doi>10.1145/182.358458]
• 97: Weber, M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Allen and Unwin, London, 1962.
• 98: Victor Weinberg, Structured Analysis, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1979
• 99: Terry Winograd , Fernando Flores, Understanding computers and cognition, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1986
• 100: A. T. Wood-Harper , Lyn Antill , D. E. Avison, Information systems definition: the Multiview approach, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Ltd., Oxford, UK, 1985
• 101: E. Yourdon, Managing the system life cycle; (2nd ed.), Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1987

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.1 Project and People Management
          Subjects: Systems development

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors