ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Examining compiled code
Full text PdfPdf (430 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the twentieth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Pages: 165 - 169  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-289-5
Also published in ...
Author
M. Smotherman  Department of Computer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/65293.71208
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The use of annotated listings of compiler-generated code has the potential to make teaching more effective in several different courses. We consider the production of such listings for several popular compilers and computer systems, including Turbo Pascal on MS-DOS machines and Pascal on Ultrix and VMS systems. The usefulness of these listings in assembly language, computer organization/architecture, and compiler courses, as well as introductory courses, is also considered.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
N.A.B. Gr~y, Introduction to Computer Systems. Sydney: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
 
2
J. Giles, "Re: using (ugh! yetch!) assembler," Usenet comp.arch news group, message-id 20894@beta.lanl.gov, July 27, 1988.
 
3
R. Colwell, private communication, April 1988.
4