ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A generalized model management system for mathematical programming
Full text PdfPdf (2.54 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 12 ,  Issue 2  (June 1986) table of contents
Pages: 92 - 126  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISSN:0098-3500
Author
Daniel R. Dolk  Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/6497.6501
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper examines mathematical programming software in the context of model management and decision support. The concept of a model management system (MMS) is introduced and compared to traditional modeling systems. An MMS is seen as a much more generalized software system that requires the confluence of existing operations research, database management, and artificial intelligence techniques. By incorporating powerful, abstraction-based representation structures, an MMS can support multiple levels of model abstraction, only one of which corresponds to traditional, solution-oriented modeling software. The database structures required to implement a knowledge-based MMS are discussed and a prototype system for mathematical programming, the Generalized eXperimental Math Programming system (GXMP), is described. An algebraic language developed for use in GXMP is described in detail.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BISSCHOP, J., AND MEERAUS, A. Toward successful modeling applications in a strategic planning environment. In Large-Scale Programming, G. B. Dantzig, A. H. Dempster, and M. J. Kallio, Eds., International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenberg, Austria, 1981, pp. 711-745.
 
2
BONCZEK, R. H., HOLSAPPLE, C. W., AND WHINSTON, i.B. A generalized decision support system using predicate calculus network data base management. Oper. Res. 29, 2 (1981), 263-281.
 
3
BONCZEK, n. H., HOLSAPPLE, C. W., AND WHINSTON, A.B. Foundations of Decision Support Systems. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1981.
 
4
CODASYL DBTG REPORT. Conference on data systems languages, ACM New York, 1971.
5
 
6
DOLK, D. R., AND NOEL, A. F. A relational dictionary prototype for implementing model management. In Proceedings of the I9th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Western Periodicals, North Hollywood, Calif., 1986, 405-411.
 
7
DOLK, D. R., AND KONSYNSKI, B.R. Knowledge representation for model management systems, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-IO, 6 (Nov. 1984), 619-627.
 
8
DOLK, D. R., AND KONSYNSK/, }~. n. Model management in organizations. In/. Manage. 9, 1 (Aug. 1985), 35-47.
 
9
DUI)A, R. O., AND GASCHNIG, J.G. Knowledge-based expert systems come of age. Byte (Sept. 1981), 238-282.
 
10
DUTTA, A., AND BASU, A. An artificial intelligence approach to model management in decision support systems. Computer 17, 9 (Sept. 1984), 89-97.
 
11
ELAM, J. J., HENDERSON, J. C., AND MILLER, L.W. Model management systems: An approach to decision support in complex organizations. Tech. Rep. No. 80-08-04, Dept. Decision Sciences, Univ. Pennsylvania, University Park, Pa., 1980.
12
13
 
14
HERSHEY, E. A., AND MESS:INK, P. W. A data base management system for PSA based on DBTG 71, ISDOS Working Paper No. 88, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1975.
 
15
KATZ, S., RISMAN, L., AND RODEH, M. A system for constructing linear programming models, IBM Syst. d. 19, 4 (1980), 505-520.
 
16
KEEN, P., AND MORTON, 1V{. S. Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1978.
 
17
 
18
KONSYNSKI, B. R., AND DOLK, D.R. Knowledge abstractions and model-management. Proc. DSS-82 (June 1982), 187-202.
 
19
KORF, R.E. Towards a model of representation changes. Artif. Int. 14, l(Aug. 1980), 41-79.
20
 
21
LEE, J. A.N. The Anatomy of a Compiler, 2nd ed. Van. Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1974.
22
 
23
LOTUS 1-2-3 USER'S MANUAt,. Lotus Development Corporation, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.
 
24
MARSTEN, R. E. XMP--A structured library of subroutines for experimental mathematical programming. MIS Tech. Rep. No. 351. Univ. Arizona, Tucson, Ariz., 1980.
25
 
26
MCDERMOTT, J. R1 revisited: Four years in the trenches. AI Magazine 5, 3 (Fall 1984}, 21-32.
27
28
 
29
SACERDOTI, E. Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces. Artif. Int. 5 (1974), 115-135.
 
30
SHORTLIFFE, E.H. Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. American Elsevier, New York, 1976.
 
31
 
32
WILL, H.J. Model management systems. In Information Systems and Organization Structure, E. Grochla and N. Syzperski, Eds., Walter deGruyter, Berlin, 1975, 467-482.



REVIEW

"William Fennell Smyth : Reviewer"

This clearly written paper first proposes a conceptual framework, called a Model Management System (MMS), for the description, storage, manipulation, display, and solution of models, especially mathematical models, of real world systems. It then  more...