ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Anonymous E-prescriptions
Full text PdfPdf (304 KB)
Source Workshop On Privacy In The Electronic Society archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society table of contents
Washington, DC
Pages: 19 - 31  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-633-1
Authors
Giuseppe Ateniese  The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Breno de Medeiros  The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 94,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/644527.644530
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper studies issues related to privacy protection of medical data, arguing that the topic is suitable for applied cryptographic research.We present the problem of medicine prescription privacy and describe a practical system that employs standard cryptographic techniques to achieve several improvements over current practices. We also introduce a very simple tool: Online group signatures which can be built via simple primitives implemented in commonly employed cryptographic libraries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
T. Albert. Doctors ask AMA to assure some privacy for their prescription pads. In http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_00/prl11225.htm, American Medical News. 2000.
 
3
T. Albert. Records privacy extended to pharmacies. In http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_01/-prsb0402.htm, American Medical News. 2001.
 
4
A. Allen. Exposed. In http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/-longterm/exposed/exposed1.htm, The Washington Post.
 
5
R. J. Anderson. NHS wide networking and patient confidentiality. In http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/bmj.ps.Z, British Medical Journal. 1995.
 
6
 
7
R. J. Anderson. Problems with the NHS cryptography strategy. In http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rja14/-zergo/zergo.html. 1997.
 
8
 
9
G. Ateniese, D. Song, and G. Tsudik. A Quasi-Efficient Revocation of Group Signatures. In Financial Cryptography (FC'02), 2002.
 
10
 
11
A. Brandt. Privacy watch: A handful of insurance and medical industry companies want to sell your personal data, but you can stop them. In http://www.pcworld.com/features/article/0,aid,43762,00.asp, PCWorld.com. 2001.
 
12
 
13
Jan Camenisch and Anna Lysyanskaya. Efficient Revocation of Anonymous Group Membership. In Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2001/113.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
D. Chaum and E. van Heyst. Group signatures. In Advances in Cryptology --- EUROCRYPT '91, volume 547 of LNCS, pages 257--265. Springer-Verlag, 1991.
 
18
L. Chen and T. P. Pedersen. New group signature schemes. In Advances in Cryptology --- EUROCRYPT '94, volume 950 of LNCS, pages 171--181, 1995.
 
19
 
20
 
21
C. Jabs. The myth of privacy: Technology is putting your medical history on public view-and you in jeopardy. FamilyPC, 2001.
 
22
N. Keene, W. Hobbie, and K. Ruccione. Childhood cancer survivors. In http://www.patientcenters.com/survivors/news/jobs.html, OncoNurse.com.
 
23
 
24
J. Ledbetter. Is buying drugs on the web too easy? In http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9906/29/drugs.idg/index.html, CNN.com.
 
25
S. Lehrman. Keeping your genes private. GeneLetter.
 
26
D. F. Linowes and R. C. Spencer. How employers handle employees' personal information. In http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilw/erepj/v1n1/lino-main.htm, 1997.
 
27
S. Martin. Insurers project big increases in prescription drug spending. In http://my.webmd.com/content/article/3645.103, WebMD.com.
 
28
V. Matyáš Jr. Protecting doctor's identity in drug prescription analysis. Health Informatics Journal, 4.4, 1998.
 
29
 
30
E. H. Shortliffe and G. O. Barnett. Medical data: Their acquisition, storage and use. In E. H. Shortliffe et al., editors, Medical Informatics, chapter 2. Springer, 2nd edition, 2000.
31
 
32
 
33
D. R. Weinstein and H. J. Worman. Electronic prescription services offer potential savings and improvements in efficiencies. In http://www.temple.edu/gisection/aganew19.html.
 
34
A4 Health Systems. http://www.-a4healthsystems.com/.
 
35
Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) X12, charter of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). http://www.x12.org
 
36
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Managed care plans develop research capabilities and partnerships. In http://www.ahcpr.gov/research/-may98/ra2.htm#head9.
 
37
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Managed care research has come of age. In http://www.ahcpr.gov/research/jul99/799ra11.htm#head3.
 
38
California Board of Pharmacy. California pharmacy law. In http://www.pharmacy.ca.gov/-lawbook_table_of_contents.htm.
 
39
Editorial. Computerized prescription systems cut error deaths{expensively. In http://cancer.med.upenn.edu/-cancer_news/reuters/2001/apr/20010412publ004.html, Oncolink Cancer News. 2001
 
40
Food and Drugs Administration. Medwatch: The FDA safety information and adverse event reporting program. In http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/.
 
41
 
42
Health Care Financing Administration. Study of pharmaceutical benefit management. In http://www.hcfa.gov/research/pharmbm.pdf, 2001.
 
43
Health Level Seven. http://www.hl7.org
 
44
Hospice Patients Alliance. When getting prescriptions filled, beware of medication substitutes! In http://www.hospicepatients.org/substituteRx.html.
 
45
International Organization for Standardization. http://www.iso.ch
 
46
National Council for Prescription Drug Programs Standard Claims Billing. http://www.hipaanet.com/hisb_ncpdp.htm
 
47
Office for Civil Rights. National standards to protect the privacy of personal health information. In http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/. 2001.
 
48
Office for Civil Rights. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. In http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/finalmaster.html. 2001.
 
49
Ohio State Board of Pharmacy. Confidentiality of patient records. In http://www.state.oh.us/pharmacy/rules/4729-05-29.html. 1999.
 
50
RX News. Prescription privacy. In http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0815/1999_April/54425466/p1/article.jhtml?term=. Gale Group, 1999.
 
51
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. EEOC settles ADA suit against BNSF for genetic bias. In http://www.eeoc.gov/press/4-18-01.html, 2001.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Giuseppe Ateniese: colleagues
Breno de Medeiros: colleagues