ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An approximate truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter agents
Full text PdfPdf (1.02 MB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
Baltimore, Maryland
SESSION: Session 4A table of contents
Pages: 205 - 214  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:0-89871-538-5
Authors
Aaron Archer  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Christos Papadimitriou  University of California, Berkeley, CA
Kunal Talwar  University of California, Berkeley, CA
Éva Tardos  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 31
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Mechanism design seeks algorithms whose inputs are provided by selfish agents who would lie if advantageous. Incentive compatible mechanisms compel the agents to tell the truth by making it in their self-interest to do so. Often, as in combinatorial auctions, such mechanisms involve the solution of NP-hard problems. Unfortunately, approximation algorithms typically destroy incentive compatibility. Randomized rounding is a commonly used technique for designing approximation algorithms. We devise a version of randomized rounding that is incentive compatible, giving a truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter agents (e.g., "single minded bidders") that approximately maximizes the social value of the auction. We discuss two orthogonal notions of truthfulness for a randomized mechanism, truthfulness with high probability and in expectation, and give a mechanism that achieves both simultaneously.We consider combinatorial auctions where multiple copies of many different items are on sale, and each bidder i desires a subset Si. Given a set of bids, the problem of finding the allocation of items that maximizes total valuation is the well-known SETPACKING problem. This problem is NP-hard, but for the case of items with many identical copies the optimum can be approximated very well. To turn this approximation algorithm into a truthful auction mechanism we overcome two problems: we show how to make the allocation algorithm monotone, and give a method to compute the appropriate payments efficiently.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
E. H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 8:17--33, 1971.
 
5
P. Cramton. Spectrum auctions. In M. Cave, S. Majumdar, and I. Vogelsang, editors, Handbook of Telecommunications Economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002.
6
 
7
 
8
A. V. Goldberg and J. D. Hartline. Competitive auctions for multicast content. Unpublished manuscript, 2000.
 
9
T. Groves. Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41(4):617--631, Jul 1973.
10
11
 
12
13
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
J. Schummer. Almost-dominant strategy implementation. Unpublished manuscript, 2001.
 
18
W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance, 16:8--37, 1961.

CITED BY  31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Aaron Archer: colleagues
Christos Papadimitriou: colleagues
Kunal Talwar: colleagues
Éva Tardos: colleagues