|
ABSTRACT
Mechanism design seeks algorithms whose inputs are provided by selfish agents who would lie if advantageous. Incentive compatible mechanisms compel the agents to tell the truth by making it in their self-interest to do so. Often, as in combinatorial auctions, such mechanisms involve the solution of NP-hard problems. Unfortunately, approximation algorithms typically destroy incentive compatibility. Randomized rounding is a commonly used technique for designing approximation algorithms. We devise a version of randomized rounding that is incentive compatible, giving a truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter agents (e.g., "single minded bidders") that approximately maximizes the social value of the auction. We discuss two orthogonal notions of truthfulness for a randomized mechanism, truthfulness with high probability and in expectation, and give a mechanism that achieves both simultaneously.We consider combinatorial auctions where multiple copies of many different items are on sale, and each bidder i desires a subset Si. Given a set of bids, the problem of finding the allocation of items that maximizes total valuation is the well-known SETPACKING problem. This problem is NP-hard, but for the case of items with many identical copies the optimum can be approximated very well. To turn this approximation algorithm into a truthful auction mechanism we overcome two problems: we show how to make the allocation algorithm monotone, and give a method to compute the appropriate payments efficiently.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
E. H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 8:17--33, 1971.
|
| |
5
|
P. Cramton. Spectrum auctions. In M. Cave, S. Majumdar, and I. Vogelsang, editors, Handbook of Telecommunications Economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002.
|
 |
6
|
Amos Fiat , Andrew V. Goldberg , Jason D. Hartline , Anna R. Karlin, Competitive generalized auctions, Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, May 19-21, 2002, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/509907.509921]
|
| |
7
|
Andrew V. Goldberg , Jason D. Hartline , Andrew Wright, Competitive auctions and digital goods, Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.735-744, January 07-09, 2001, Washington, D.C., United States
|
| |
8
|
A. V. Goldberg and J. D. Hartline. Competitive auctions for multicast content. Unpublished manuscript, 2000.
|
| |
9
|
T. Groves. Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41(4):617--631, Jul 1973.
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
Daniel Lehmann , Liaden Ita O'Callaghan , Yoav Shoham, Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions, Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce, p.96-102, November 03-05, 1999, Denver, Colorado, United States
[doi> 10.1145/336992.337016]
|
| |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
J. Schummer. Almost-dominant strategy implementation. Unpublished manuscript, 2001.
|
| |
18
|
W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance, 16:8--37, 1961.
|
CITED BY 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ming-Yang Kao , Xiang-Yang Li , WeiZhao Wang, Towards truthful mechanisms for binary demand games: a general framework, Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, p.213-222, June 05-08, 2005, Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erik D. Demaine , Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi , Uriel Feige , Mohammad R. Salavatipour, Combination can be hard: approximability of the unique coverage problem, Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm, p.162-171, January 22-26, 2006, Miami, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venkatesan Guruswami , Jason D. Hartline , Anna R. Karlin , David Kempe , Claire Kenyon , Frank McSherry, On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing, Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, January 23-25, 2005, Vancouver, British Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|