ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Selection with monotone comparison costs
Full text PdfPdf (829 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
Baltimore, Maryland
SESSION: Session 1A table of contents
Pages: 10 - 17  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:0-89871-538-5
Authors
Sampath Kannan  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sanjeev Khanna  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of selecting the rth-smallest element from a list of n elements under a model where the comparisons may have different costs depending on the elements being compared. This model was introduced by [3] and is realistic in the context of comparisons between complex objects. An important special case of this general cost model is one where the comparison costs are monotone in the sizes of the elements being compared. This monotone cost model covers most "natural" cost models that arise and the selection problem turns out to be the most challenging one among the usual problems for comparison-based algorithms. We present an O(log2 n)-competitive algorithm for selection under the monotone cost model. This is in contrast to an Ω(n) lower bound that is known for arbitrary comparison costs. We also consider selection under a special case of monotone costs --- the min model where the cost of comparing two elements is the minimum of the sizes. We give a randomized O(1)-competitive algorithm for the min model.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
J. HARTLINE, E. HONG, A. MOHR, E. ROCKE, AND K. YASUHARA. As reported in {3}. Nov. 2000.
 
6
 
7


Collaborative Colleagues:
Sampath Kannan: colleagues
Sanjeev Khanna: colleagues