Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art

ABSTRACT

HCI evaluation methods are useful for improving the design of interactive systems, yet they may be rejected by nontraditional technology disciplines such as media art. We have developed a two-tiered evaluation model that responds to the concerns of interactive artists and have used it to improve the design of an interactive artwork, the Influencing Machine, exploring issues in affective computing. The method was interpretive, focusing on giving the artists a grounded feeling for how the machine was interpreted and their message was communicated. We describe the resulting design of the Influencing Machine and the reactions of users. The study itself is part of the art piece - together these activities achieve the goal of the artists: to provoke our cultural notions of whether a machine can "have emotions".

REFERENCES

• 1: Hugh Beyer , Karen Holtzblatt, Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1998
• 2: Joseph F. Dumas , Janice C. Redish, A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., Westport, CT, 1993
• 3: Dunne, A. & Raby, F. (2001). Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Basel, Switzerland: August/Birkhaeuser.
• 4: Angela Garabet , Steve Mann , James Fung, Exploring design through wearable computing art(ifacts), CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/506443.506520]
• 5: William Gaver , Anthony Dunne, Projected realities: conceptual design for cultural effect, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.600-607, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303168]
• 6: Gaver, W., Hooker, B., & Dunne, A. (2001). The Presence Project. London: Royal College of Art.
• 7: Höök, K. (1998). Evaluating the Utility and Usability of an Adaptive Hypermedia System, in Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 10 (5).
• 8: Kristina Höök , Per Persson , Marie Sjölinder, Evaluating users' experience of a character-enhanced information space, AI Communications, v.13 n.3, p.195-212, January 1, 2001
• 9: Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press.
• 10: Mateas, M. (2001). Expressive AI: A hybrid art and science practice, in Leonardo, 34 (2), 147--153.
• 11: Bonnie A. Nardi, Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1995
• 12: Oudshoorn, N. (1996) Gender Scripts in Technologie: Noodlot of Uitdaging? Tijdschrift voor Vrouwenstudies, 17(1): 350--367.
• 13: Penny, S., Smith, J., Sengers, P., Bernhardt, A., & Schulte, J. (2001). Traces: Embodied Immersive Interaction with Semi-Autonomous Avatars, in Convergence, 7:2, 47--65.
• 14: Phoebe Sengers , Rainer Liesendahi , Werner Magar , Christoph Seibert , Boris Müller , Thorston Joachims , Weidong Geng , Pia Mårtensson , Kristina Höök, The enigmatics of affect, Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, June 25-28, 2002, London, England [doi>10.1145/778712.778728]
• 15: Weiser, M. & Seely Brown, J. (1996). Designing Calm Technology, in PowerGrid Journal, 1(1).

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: User-centered design

Additional Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.5 ARTS AND HUMANITIES
      Subjects: Fine arts

General Terms:
Design

Keywords:
affective computing, evaluation, interactive art