ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families
Full text PdfPdf (468 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
SESSION: Domesticated design table of contents
Pages: 17 - 24  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-630-7
Authors
Hilary Hutchinson  HCIL, UMIACS, CS/University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Wendy Mackay  LRI, INRIA Futurs/Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex, France
Bo Westerlund  CID, NADA/Kungl Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden
Benjamin B. Bederson  HCIL, UMIACS, CS/University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Allison Druin  HCIL, UMIACS, CS/University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Catherine Plaisant  HCIL, UMIACS, CS/University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Michel Beaudouin-Lafon  LRI, INRIA Futurs/Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex, France
Stéphane Conversy  LRI, INRIA Futurs/Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex, France
Helen Evans  LRI, INRIA Futurs/Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex, France
Heiko Hansen  LRI, INRIA Futurs/Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex, France
Nicolas Roussel  LRI, INRIA Futurs/Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex, France
Björn Eiderbäck  CID, NADA/Kungl Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 70,   Downloads (12 Months): 489,   Citation Count: 123
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642616
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We describe a new method for use in the process of co-designing technologies with users called technology probes. Technology probes are simple, flexible, adaptable technologies with three interdisciplinary goals: the social science goal of understanding the needs and desires of users in a real-world setting, the engineering goal of field-testing the technology, and the design goal of inspiring users and researchers to think about new technologies. We present the results of designing and deploying two technology probes, the messageProbe and the videoProbe, with diverse families in France, Sweden, and the U.S. We conclude with our plans for creating new technologies for and with families based on our experiences.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Druin, A. (2002). The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), pp. 1--25.
 
5
Dunne, A. & Raby, F. (2001) Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Switzerland: Birkhauser.
 
6
Gaver, W. (2002). Designing for Homo Ludens. i3 Magazine, June (2002), pp. 2--5.
7
 
8
Hemmings, T., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Clarke, K. & Rouncefield, K. (2002). Probing the Probes. Proc. of PDC 2002. CPSR, pp. 42--50.
9
 
10
Huizinga, J. (1950). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press.
 
11
Hutchinson, H., Plaisant, C. & Druin, A. (2002). Case Study: A Message Board as a Technology Probe for Family Communication and Coordination. Position Paper, Workshop on New Technologies for Families, CHI '02, http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/interliving/chi02.
 
12
Interbind (2002), http://www.interbind.com.
 
13
Interliving (2002), http://interliving.kth.se.
 
14
Java Shared Data Toolkit (2002), http:// java.sun.com/products/java-media/jsdt/index.html.
 
15
 
16
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V. & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), pp. 49--74.
 
17
 
18
Mackay, W. (1990). Users and Customizable Software: A Co-Adaptive Phenomenon. Ph.D. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19
20
21
 
22
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
 
23
 
24
 
25
Shellenbarger, S. (2001). Work & Family: Americans Are Split on Impact of Technology on the Family. The Wall Street Journal, January 10, 2001.
 
26
Voida, A. & Mynatt, E. (2002). Grounding Design in Values. Position Paper, Workshop on New Technologies for Families, CHI '02, http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/interliving/chi02.
 
27
Westerlund, B. & Lindquist, S. (2002). Aesthetic Perspectives on Participatory Design in the InterLiving Project. Position Paper, Workshop on New Technologies for Families, CHI '02, http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/interliving/chi02.
 
28
Westerlund, B., Lindquist, S. & Sundblad, Y. (2001). Cooperative Design of Communication Support for and with Families in Stockholm - Communication Maps, Communication Probes and Low-Tech Prototypes. Proc. of Equator IRC Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing in Domestic Environments.

CITED BY  123

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hilary Hutchinson: colleagues
Wendy Mackay: colleagues
Bo Westerlund: colleagues
Benjamin B. Bederson: colleagues
Allison Druin: colleagues
Catherine Plaisant: colleagues
Michel Beaudouin-Lafon: colleagues
Stéphane Conversy: colleagues
Helen Evans: colleagues
Heiko Hansen: colleagues
Nicolas Roussel: colleagues
Björn Eiderbäck: colleagues