ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
File access performance of diskless workstations
Full text PdfPdf (2.37 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 3  (August 1986) table of contents
Pages: 238 - 268  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISSN:0734-2071
Authors
Edward D. Lazowska  Univ. of Washington, Seattle
John Zahorjan  Univ. of Washington, Seattle
David R. Cheriton  Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA
Willy Zwaenepoel  Rice Univ., Houston, TX
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 37
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/6420.6423
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper studies the performance of single-user workstations that access files remotely over a local area network. From the environmental, economic, and administrative points of view, workstations that are diskless or that have limited secondary storage are desirable at the present time. Even with changing technology, access to shared data will continue to be important. It is likely that some performance penalty must be paid for remote rather than local file access. Our objectives are to assess this penalty and to explore a number of design alternatives that can serve to minimize it. Our approach is to use the results of measurement experiments to parameterize queuing network performance models. These models then are used to assess performance under load and to evahrate design alternatives. The major conclusions of our study are: (1) A system of diskless workstations with a shared file server can have satisfactory performance. By this, we mean performance comparable to that of a local disk in the lightly loaded case, and the ability to support substantial numbers of client workstations without significant degradation. As with any shared facility, good design is necessary to minimize queuing delays under high load. (2) The key to efficiency is protocols that allow volume transfers at every interface (e.g., between client and server, and between disk and memory at the server) and at every level (e.g., between client and server at the level of logical request/response and at the level of local area network packet size). However, the benefits of volume transfers are limited to moderate sizes (8-16 kbytes) by several factors. (3) From a performance point of view, augmenting the capabilities of the shared file server may be more cost effective than augmenting the capabilities of the client workstations. (4) Network contention should not be a performance problem for a lo-Mbit network and 100 active workstations in a software development environment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
CHERITON, D.R. The V kernel: A software base for distributed systems. IEEE Softw. I, 2 (Apr. 1984), 19-42.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
LEACH, P. J., LEVINE, P. H., DOUROS, B. P., HAMILTON, J. A., NELSON, D. L., AND STUMPF, B.L. The architecture of an integrated local network. IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. SAC- 1, 5 (Nov. 1983), 842-857.
6
7
8
9
10
11
 
12
SMITH, A.J. Analysis of long term file reference patterns for application to file migration algorithms. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng. SE-7, 4 (July 1981), 403-417.
13

CITED BY  37


REVIEW

"Jason Gait : Reviewer"

The authors study the performance of workstations that access files across networks. Their approach is to use experiments to parameterize performance models, which are used to evaluate design alternatives. They conclude that diskless workstation  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Edward D. Lazowska: colleagues
John Zahorjan: colleagues
David R. Cheriton: colleagues
Willy Zwaenepoel: colleagues