ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
DRM {and, or, vs.} the law
Full text HtmlHtml (28 KB),  PdfPdf (80 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 46 ,  Issue 4  (April 2003) table of contents
Digital rights management
SPECIAL ISSUE: Digital rights management and fair use by design table of contents
Pages: 41 - 45  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Pamela Samuelson  University of California at Berkeley
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 35,   Downloads (12 Months): 295,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/641205.641229
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The main purpose of DRM is not to prevent copyright infringement but to change consumer expectations about what they are entitled to do with digital content.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Biddle, P., England, P., Peinado, M., and Willman, B. The darknet and the future of content distribution. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Workshop on Digital Rights Management (Washington, DC, Nov. 18, 2002).
 
2
Burk, D. and Cohen, J. Fair use infrastructure for rights management systems. Harvard J. Law & Tech. 15 (2001), 41--83.
 
3
Free Software Foundation. Some Confusing or Loaded Words and Phrases That Are Worth Avoiding; see www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html.
 
4
 
5
Mulligan, D. and Burstein, A. Implementing copyright limitations in rights expression languages. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Workshop on Digital Rights Management (Washington, DC, Nov. 18, 2002).
 
6
Samuelson, P. Intellectual property and the digital economy: Why the anti-circumvention rules need to be revised. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 14 (1999).
 
7
Stefik, M. Shifting the possible: How trusted systems and digital property rights challenge us to rethink digital publishing. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 12 (1997).

CITED BY  8